A large amount of literature has been published on methods for determining sample size and power for clinical trials. Although formulae exist to determine sample size for different designs, in practice the methods are rarely used. Instead, sample size estimates are usually based on simple formulae derived for the comparison of two means or binomial proportions.
This paper describes some useful theory for sample size estimation when comparing more than two treatment groups. Where the theory is not applicable, it is demonstrated that simulation can be used as an alternative approach.
ArmitagePBerryG.Statistical methods in medical research.2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell; 1987:182.
2.
BlandJMAn introduction to medical statistics.Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1987:160.
3.
FleissJLThe design and analysis of clinical experiments.Chichester: Wiley; 1986:371–376.
4.
FrisonLPocockSJRepeated measures in clinical trials: Analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med.1992;11:1685–1704.
MontgomerySAAsbergM.A new depression rating scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry.1979;134:382–389.
7.
LindleyDVScottWFNew Cambridge Elementary Statistical Tables.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
8.
BannerNRLloydHMHamiltonRDInnesJAGuzAYacoubMHCardiopulmonary response to dynamic exercise after heart and combined heart-lung transplanatation. Br Heart J.1989;61:215–223.
9.
LuckiIRickelsKGeseckeMAGellerA.Differential effects of the anxiolytic drugs, diazepam and buspirone, on memory function. Br J Clin Pharacol.1987;23:207–211.
10.
RowbothamDJNimmoWSEffects of cisapride on morphine-induced delay in gastric emptying. Br J Anaesth.1987;59:536–539.
11.
TatsutaMIsihiHYamamuraHYamamotoRTaniguchiH.Enhancement by tetragastrin of experimental induction of gastric epithelium in the duodenum. Gut.1989;30:311–315.
12.
LaubscherNFNormalizing the noncentral t and F distributions. Ann Math Stat.1960;31:1105–1112.
13.
CohenJ.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.New York: Academic Press; 1977.
14.
RubergSJDose response studies. Some design considerations. J Biopharma Stat.1995;5:1–14.
15.
RubergSJDose response studies. Analysis and interpretation. J Biopharma Stat.1995;5:15–42.
16.
AbelsonRPTukeyJWEfficient utilisation of non-numerical information in quantitative analysis: General theory and the case of simple order. Ann Math Stat.1963;34:1347–1369.
17.
YatemanNSkeneA.The use of simulation in the design of two cardiovascular survival studies. Stat Med.1993;12:1365–1372.
