WardellWM. Introduction of new therapeutic drugs in the United States and Great Britain: an international comparison. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1973;14(5):773–790.
2.
WardellWM. The drug lag revisited: comparison by therapeutic area of patterns of drugs marketed in the United States and Great Britain from 1972 through 1976. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1978;24(5):499–524.
3.
WardellWM. Therapeutic implication of the drug lag. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1974;15(1):73–96.
4.
WardellWM. Statement at hearing on the Food and Drug Administration's new drug approval process, before the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology of the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, June 19, 1979. Washington, DC: US GPO, 1979.
5.
KennedyD.A calm look at “drug lag.”JAMA.1978;239(5):423–426.
6.
KennedyD.Statement at hearing on the Food and Drug Administration's new drug approval process, before the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Technology of the Committee on Science and Technology, US House of Representatives, June 21, 1979. Washington, DC: US GPO, 1979.
7.
KaitinKIMattisonNNorthingtonFKLasagnaL.The drug lag: an update of new drug introductions in the United States and the United Kingdom, 1977 through 1987. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1989;46(2):121–138.
8.
KaitinKIRichardBWLasagnaL.Trends in drug development: the 1985-86 new drug approvals. J Clin Pharmacol.1987;27(8):542–548.
9.
KaitinKIDiCerboPALasagnaL.The new drug approvals of 1987, 1988, and 1989: trends in drug development. J Clin Pharmacol.1991;31(2):116–122.
10.
KaitinKIManocchiaMSeibringMLasagnaL.The new drug approvals of 1990, 1991, and 1992: trends in drug development. J Clin Pharmacol.1994;34(2):120–127.
HassAEJr.Where drug marketing patterns are similar. Med Mark Media.1983;18:78–83.
13.
WittesRE. Antineoplastic agents and FDA regulations: square pegs for round holes?Cancer Treat Rep.1987;71(9):795–806.
14.
Bienz-TadmorB.Biopharmaceuticals go to market: patterns of worldwide development. Biol Technology.1993;11(2):168–172.
15.
Bienz-TadmorBBrownJSSeoPSBryantNR. Availability of biopharmaceuticals and conventional drugs in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1993, Honolulu.
16.
Bienz-TadmorBBrownJ.Biopharmaceuticals and conventional drugs: comparing development times. BioPharm.1994;7(2):44–49.
17.
VinarOKleinDFPotterWZGauseEM. A survey of psychotropic medications not available in the United States. Neuropsychopharmacol.1991;5(4):201–217.
18.
The NDA Pipeline-1993.Chevy Chase, MD: F-D-C Development Corp., 1994.
19.
DiMasiJALasagnaL.The economics of psychotropic drug development. Chapter 160 in Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress.BloomFEKupferDJ eds. New York: Raven Press; 1995:1883–1896.
20.
KesslerDA. FDA and America's competitiveness. Distinguished Speaker address at the 1992 Harold and Jane Hirsh Health Policy Symposium, George Washington University, June 22, 1992.
21.
BakkeOMWardellWMLasagnaL.Drug discontinuations in the United Kingdom and the United States, 1964 to 1983: issues of safety. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1984;35(5):559–567.
22.
BakkeOMManocchiaMdeAbajoFKaitinKILasagnaL.Drug Safety Discontinuations in the UK, the US, and Spain, 1974-1993: A Regulatory Perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther.1995;57.
23.
Competitive Enterprise Institute.Consumer advocacy group attacks FDA for slow approval of cancer treatment. Kazman S. May 14, 1992, press release.
24.
First do no harm. Wall Street Journal. Dec. 21, 1987:20.