Abstract
The scientific requirements and formats for clinical study authorizations (CSA) — IND, CTX, CTC, CTN, etc. — vary considerably from country to country. In some cases they are virtually nonexistent. A comparison is made of the situation in some of the most demanding countries — Australia, Sweden, United Kingdom, and the United States — to highlight differrences and similarities. Further, the levels of the CSAs required to proceed through Phase I–III are considered as steps which eventually culminate into marketing authorization applications (MAA). Such a stepwise development strategy is bound to result in more easily prepared MAAs which may be more quickly approved
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
