Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article introduces two concepts which simplify the display and interpretation of lab data monitoring. The two concepts are: (1) a normalization (or standardization) of each lab value so that it can be interpreted without reference to its normal range and (2) a multivariate scoring system that combines lab parameters into functionally related groups. The technique is demonstrated with real clinical data. Several functional group scores are evaluated and a Global Score produced for individual patients at each time point. The Global Score, viewed over the course of therapy, presents a concise review of drug safety (or toxicity) for each patient and for the study as a whole. Examples will illustrate that the global score can be used as “a safety measure.”

Keywords

Drug safety evaluation Normalized lab parameters Deviations from normal range Multivariate score for lab abnormality assessment Safety measure of abnormal lab values

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benson

: Strategies for Improving the use of the clinical laboratory: Computer applications. IEEE 1978; 410–412.

Bezemer

Netelenbros

Mulder

: Determining reference (“normal”) limits in medicine: An application. Stat Med 1983; 2:191–198.

Bronzino

: Computer applications for patient care — An overview. J Clin Eng 1983; 8:291–296.

Ciccolunghi

Fowler

Chaudri

: Interpretation of hematological and biochemical laboratory data in large-scale, multicenter clinical trials. CIBA-GEIGY Limited, J Clin Pharmacol 1979; 303–312.

Clarke

: The characterization of distributions of chemistries with the SMA 12/60. Department of Statistics NASA Contract Technical Report No. 104, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, 1971.

Clark

Welling

McCloskey

: The help system in the clinical laboratory: Laboratory data in drug monitoring and interpretation of drug effects on laboratory tests. IEEE 1979; 580–582.

Elveback

Guillier

Keating

Jr. : Health, normality, and the ghost of Gauss. JAMA 1970; 211:69–76.

Gardner

Scoville

West

: Integrated computer systems for monitoring of the critically ill. University of Utah and LSD Hospital, 325 Eighth Avenue, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Harris

: Some theory of reference values. I. Stratified (categorized) normal ranges and a method for following an individual's clinical laboratory values. Clin Chem 1975; 21:1457–1464.

10.

Harris

DeMets

: Estimation of normal ranges and cumulative proportions by transforming observed distributions to Gaussian form. Clin Chem 1972; 18:605–612.

11.

Johnson

: Some basic considerations of the needs for improved clinical laboratory data analyses. Human Pathol 1973; 4:5–8.

12.

Lewis

: Commentary: Clinical laboratory information systems. IEEE 1979; 67:1299–1300.

13.

Lewis

Boyd

Votava

: Clinical laboratory test evaluation using feature selection techniques. Division of Laboratory Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

14.

McPherson

Healy

MJR

Flynn

: The effect of age, sex and other factors on blood chemistry in health. Clin Chim Acta 1978; 84:373–397.

15.

Reed

Henry

Mason

: Influence of statistical method used on the resulting estimate of normal range. Clin Chem 1971; 17:275–284.

16.

Sunderman

Jr. : Current concepts of “normal values,” “reference values,” and “discrimination values” in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem 1975; 21:1873–1877.

17.

Werner

Marsh

: Normal values: Theoretical and practical aspects. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1975; 5:81–100.

A Procedure for the Simplification and Assessment of Lab Parameters in Clinical Trials

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References