SennSJIndividual therapy: New dawn or false dawn. Drug Inf J.2001;35:1479–1494.
2.
GuyattGHJuniperEFWalterSDGriffithLEGoldsteinRSInterpreting treatment effects in randomised trials [see comments]. Br Med J.1998;316:690–693.
3.
SennSJStatistical Issues in Drug Development.Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley; 1997.
4.
SennSJApplying results of randomised trials to patients. N of 1 trials are needed [letter; comment]. Br Med J.1998;317:537–538.
5.
ShumakerRCMetzlerCMThe phenytoin trial is a case study of “individual bioequivalence.”Drug Inf J.1998;32:1063–1072.
6.
AndersonSHauckWWConsideration of individual bioequivalence. J Pharmacokinetics Biopharmaceutics.1990;18:259–273.
7.
SennSJStatistical quality in analysing clinical trials. Good Clin Practice J.2000;7:22–26.
8.
SennSJAuthorship of drug industry trials. Pharmaceutical Stat.2002;1:5–7.
9.
GuyattGJuniperEFGoldsteinBJAuthor's reply. Br Med J.1998;317:537.
10.
SennSJCross-over Trials in Clinical Research.Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley; 2002.
11.
WalterSDNumber needed to treat (NNT): Estimation of a measure of clinical benefit. Stat Med.2001;20:3947–3962.
12.
JuniperEFJohnstonPRBorkhoffCMGuyattGHBouletLPHaukiojaA.Quality of life in asthma clinical trials: Comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.1995;151:66–70.
13.
JuniperEFGuyattGHFerriePJGriffithLEMeasuring quality of life in asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis.1993;147:832–838.
14.
HorwitzRISingerBHMakuchRWViscoliCMCan treatment that is helpful on average be harmful to some patients? A study of the conflicting information needs of clinical inquiry and drug regulation [see comments]. J Clin Epidemiol.1996;49:395–400.