This research examined the effects of format in print direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug advertisements in communicating benefit and risks. Print advertisements for six fictitious drugs were created. Each drug was manipulated on the basis of six conditions, differing on the basis of color and the integration or separation of the benefit and risk information. A sixth condition (control) lacked risk information. Participants were presented with the DTC advertisements. Performance on a subsequent knowledge test of benefit and risk information was measured. Later participants were shown six advertisements of a single drug advertisement each representing the manipulations and were asked to rank them on perceived effectiveness of communicating drug benefits and risks. Results showed that the presence of physical features (eg, color) that distinguish the risk information from other text facilitated knowledge acquisition and increased perceived effectiveness ranks. Implications for the presentation of print risk information in advertisements are discussed.
WogalterMS. Knowledge gained about prescription drug benefits and risks from DTC print advertisements as a function of warning format. Presented at the DIA 37th Annual Meeting, July 7-12, 2001, Denver, CO.
2.
WogalterMPaineCMillsBSmith-JacksonT. Application of cognitive principles to the design of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.1999;515–519.
3.
Food and Drug Administration.Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Portions Revised or New as Amended by the FDA Modernization Act of 1997. Subchapter D. Section 551.360 (a). Requirements for Dissemination of Treatment Information on Drugs or Devices.Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 1998.
4.
PinesWL. New challenges for medical product promotion and its regulation. Food Drug Law J.1997;52:61–65.
5.
DiMatteoMRFriedmenHS. Social Psychology and Medicine.Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn and Hain; 1982.
6.
Prevention Magazine. National Survey of Consumer Reactions to Direct-to-Consumer Advertising. Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press; 1998.
7.
GrantN. Prescription drugs: Concerns and controversies of direct-to-consumer advertisements. Cornell Political Forum.1998;12:15–18.
8.
American Academy of Pediatrics.Policy Statement: Prescription Drug Advertising Direct to the Consumer (RE9212). Pediatrics.1991;88:174–175.
9.
National Consumers League.Health Care Information and the Consumer: A Public Opinion Survey. Washington, DC: National Consumers League; 1998.
10.
DavisJJ. Riskier than we think?: The relationship between risk statement completeness and perceptions of direct to consumer advertised prescription drugs. J Health Commun.2000;5:349–369.
11.
Steering Committee for the Collaborative Development of a Long-Range Action Plan for the Provision of Useful Prescription Medicine Information.Action Plan for the Provision of Useful Prescription Medicine Information.Keystone, CO: Keystone Center; 1996.
12.
LaugheryKRWogalterMSYoungSL, eds. Human Factors Perspectives on Warnings: Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings 1980-1993.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 1994.
13.
MillerJMLehtoMR. Warnings and Safety Instructions: Annotated and Indexed.Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical Publications; 2001.
14.
WogalterMSYoungSLLaugheryKR, eds. Human Factors Perspectives on Warnings, Volume 2: Selections from Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetings 1993-2000.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2001.
15.
HartleyJ. Designing instruction text for older readers: A literature review. Br J Educa Tech.2001;25:172–188.
16.
WogalterMSShaverEEEvaluation of list vs. paragraph text format on search time for warning symptoms in a product manual. In BittnerACJrChampneyPCMorrisseySJ, eds. Advances Occup Ergonomics Safety.Louisville, KY: IOS Press and Ohmsha; 2001:434–438.
17.
BarlowTWogalterMS. Alcoholic beverage warnings in magazine and television advertisements. J Consumer Research.1993;20:147–156.
18.
WickensCD. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance.2nd ed.New York: Harper Collins; 1992.
19.
WickensCDCarswellCM. The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and its relevance to display design. Human Factors.1995;37:473–494.
20.
ButtigiegMASandersonPM. Emergent features in visual display design for two types of failure detection tasks. Human Factors.1991;33:631–651.
21.
YoungSLWogalterMS. Comprehension and memory of instruction manual warnings: Conspicuous print and pictorial icons. Human Factors.1990;32:637–649.
22.
ANSI.Product Safety Signs and Labels: American National Standard Z535.4. Arlington, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1998.
23.
RashidRWogalterMS. Effects of warning border color, width, and design on perceived effectiveness. In DasBKarwowskiW, eds. Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety. II.Louisville, KY: IOS Press and Ohmsha; 1997:455–458.
24.
WogalterMSKaisherMJFrederickLJMagurnoABBrewsterBM. Hazard level perceptions of warning components and configurations. Int J Cognitive Ergonomics.1998;2:123–143.
25.
Sadler-SmithE. “Learning style”: Frameworks and instruments. Educat Psychol.1997;17:51–63.
26.
SmithPJ. Technology student learning preferences and the design of flexible learning programs. Instructional Science.2001;29:237–254.
AllenPACoyneAC. Are there age differences in chunking?J Gerontol.1989;44:181–183.
29.
GuttentagREHuntRR. Adult age differences in memory for imagined and performed actions. J Gerontol.1988;43:107–108.
30.
MorrellRWParkDCPoonLW. Effects of labeling techniques on memory and comprehension of prescription information in young and old adults. J Gerontol.1990;45:166–172.
31.
HancockHERogersWAFiskAD. Age as a predictor of adequate warning design. Proceedings of the 14th Triennial Conference of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2000;44-4:802–805.
32.
HessTMFlannaganD. Schema-based retrieval processes in young and older adults. J Gerontol.1992;47:52–58.
33.
MorrowDGLeirerVOAndrassyJMTankeEDStine-MorrowEAL. Medication instruction design: Younger and older adult schemas for taking medication. Human Factors.1996;38:556–573.
34.
BoucherJOsgoodCE. The Pollyanna hypothesis. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behavior.1969;8:1–8.
35.
MatlinMWGawronVJ. Individual differences in Pollyannaism. J Personality Assess.1979;43:411–412.
36.
EverettSE. Lay audience response to prescription drug advertising. J Advertis Research.1991;31:43–49.
37.
YoungSLLaugheryKRWogalterMSLovvollD. Receiver characteristics in safety communications. In KarwowskiWMarrasWS, eds. The Occupational Ergonomics Handbook.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1999:693–706.
38.
SmedlerA-CTorestadBI. Verbal intelligence: A key to basic skills. Educational Studies.1996;22:343–356.
39.
WogalterMSConzolaVCVigilanteWJ. Applying usability engineering principles to the design and testing of warning messages. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 1999;43:921–925.
40.
DeckerCL. Winning with P and G: 99 Principles and Practices of Proctor and Gamble's Success.New York, NY: Pocket Books; 1998.
41.
DuPlessisE. Recognition and recall. J Advertis Research.1994;34:75–91.
