Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper argues that the concepts of therapeutic equivalence and noninferiority trials have some unclear logic and give results that might not be in accordance with clinical experience. They are also totally unnecessary. The discussion focuses on therapeutic equivalence trials, but carries over directly to noninferiority trials. Therapeutic equivalence proves to be a flexible tool for delusion and should be abandoned. Statistics should end where it can claim to be correct and useful, in this case, with estimates and confidence limits of clinically relevant parameters such as relative dose potency. If therapeutic equivalence is still needed for special purposes, the testing and definition should be done on the dose scale.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Keywords

Therapeutic equivalence Noninferiority trials Therapeutic ratio

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1999;18:1905–1942.

Röhmel

Therapeutic equivalence investigations: Statistical considerations. Stat Med. 1998;17:1703–1714.

FDC Reports, The pink sheets. May 6, 1991;53(18):14–15.

Källén

Larsson

Dose response studies: How do we make them conclusive?

Stat Med. 1999;18:629–641.

Ahrens

Therapeutic equivalence of Spiros dry powder inhaler and Ventolin metered dose inhaler. A bioassay using methcholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1238–1243.

Parameswaran

Protection against methacholine bronchoconstriction to assess relative potency of inhaled β2-agonists. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:354–357.

Senn

Statistical issues in Drug Development. Chichester: John Wiley; 1997.

Finney

Statistical Methods in Biological Assay. London, UK: Griffin; 1978.

Govindarajulu

Statistical Techniques in Bioassay. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2001.

10.

Senn

An incomplete blocks cross-over in asthma: A case study in collaboration. Cross-over Clinical Trials. Vollmar

Hothorn

L.A.

, eds. Stuttgart: Fischer; 1997:3–26.

11.

Boulet

Comparison of DiskusTM inhaler, a new multidose powder inhaler, with DiskhalerTM inhaler for the delivery of Salmeterol to asthmatic patients. J Asthma. 1995;32(6):429–436.

12.

Ebbutt

Frith

Practical issues in equivalence trials. Stat Med. 1998;17:1691–1701.

13.

Senn

Statistical issues in short term trials in asthma. Drug Inf J. 1993;27:779–791.

14.

Rott

Böcskei

Poszi

Juhasz

Larsson

Rosenborg

On the relative therapeutic index between formoterol Turbuhaler and Salbutamol pressurized metered dose (pMDI) inhaler in asthmatic patients. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:suppl 28:324s.

15.

Bates

Watts

Nonlinear Regression Analysis and its Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1988.

16.

Hamasaki

Statistical approaches to detect dose-response relationships. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:579–590.

17.

Källén

Larsson

On the definition of therapeutic equivalence. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:349–354.

A Note on Therapeutic Equivalence and Therapeutic Ratio with Application to Studies in Respiratory Diseases

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References