Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The randomized available case study, in which a nonrandom set of cases (patients, animals, laboratory runs) is randomized among two or more treatments, is a staple of biomedical research. Traditionally, such studies have been analyzed as though the cases were a random sample from an infinitely large population (1). The resulting statistical inferences address incorrect populations. More importantly, in the presence of response measurement error these inferences are inappropriate for the correct populations, understating the differential impact of treatment (2). In this paper I develop and illustrate a nonparametric bootstrap approach to inference in such studies, an approach that is faithful to the local origins of the randomized cases and can account for the influence of measurement error.

Keywords

Available cases Bootstrap inference Measurement error Randomization Resampling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ludbrook

Dudley

Why permutation tests are superior to t and F tests in biomedical research. Am Statistician. 1998;52:127–132.

Reichardt

Gollob

Justifying the use and increasing the power of a test for a randomized experiment with a convenience sample. Psychological Met. 1999;4:117–128.

Edgington

Randomization Tests. 3rd Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995.

Good

Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer; 2000.

Lunneborg

Data Analysis by Resampling: Concepts and Applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole; 2000.

Rubin

Comment: Neyman (1923) and causal inference in experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci. 1990;5:472–480.

Rubin

Formal models of statistical inference for causal effects. J Stat Planning Inference. 1990;25:279–292.

Rubin

Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. Biometrics. 1991;47:1213–1234.

Wilkinson

The Task Force for Statistical Inference. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. Am Psychologist. 1999;54:594–604.

10.

Elfron

Tibshirani

An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993.

11.

Davison

Hinkley

Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

12.

Chernick

Bootstrap Methods: A Practitioner's Guide. New York: Wiley; 1999.

13.

Neyman

On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles. Section 9. Statistical Sci. 1990;5:465–472.

14.

Efron

Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.

15.

Booth

Butler

Hall

Bootstrap methods for finite populations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89:1282–1289.

16.

Anastasi

Psychological Testing. London: Collier MacMillan; 1982.

17.

MathSoft. S-Plus user's guide. Seattle: Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft, Inc.; 1999.

18.

Hand

Daly

Lunn

McConway

Ostrowski

A Handbook of Small Data Sets. London: Chapman & Hall; 1994.

Bootstrap Inference for Local Populations

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References