The United States Orphan Drug Act passed in 1983 provides four provisions to spur the development of medications for conditions that might otherwise have been abandoned. The Office of Orphan Drug Product Development was established to provide assistance in protocol development, and to administer a grants program. A tax credit incentive also was enacted but the most significant incentive has been the market exclusivity clause. Despite such measures, the act in the wake of technological and economic developments should continually be reexamined to enhance efficiency in development of orphan products, to ensure accessibility of these products to patients, and to minimize economic abuses by developers.
MeyersASThe US Orphan Drug Act: Should the law cover higher profitable drugs?World Pharmaceut. Standards Rev.1991;1:24–25.
2.
BrandissouSYagoubiNHasselotN.Orphan Drugs: a problem of public health and an economic stake. Therapie.1996;51:647–653.
3.
ShulmanSRBienz-TadmorBSeoPSImplementation of the Orphan Drug Act: 1998–1991. Food Drug Law J.1992;47(4):363–403.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expnaded surveillance case definitions for AIDS among adolescents and adults. JAMA.1993;269(6): 729–730.
5.
GarberA.Benefits versus profits—has the Orphan Drug Act gone too far?Pharmacoeconomics.1994;5(2):88–92.
6.
21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 316.2.
7.
PeabodyJWRubyACannonP.The economics of orphan drug policy in the US—Can the legislation be improved?Pharmacoeconomics.1995;8(5):874–884.
8.
ArnoPSBonuckKDavisM.Rare disease, drug development, and AIDS: the impact of the Orphan Drug Act. Milbank Quarterly.1995;73(2):231–252.
9.
HaffnerMEThe United States Orphan Drug Act: Challenges and successes. Drug Inf. J.1997;31: 23–25.
10.
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development.
11.
Statements by Michael Friedman, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Before the Subcommittee on Human Resources and Intergovernmental Relations, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, U.S. House of Representatives; Sept 12, 1996.
12.
HaffnerMEKelseyJVEvaluation of orphan products by the US Food and Drug Administration. Int J Technol Assess Health Care.1992;8(4):647–657.
13.
Orphan Disease Update1998XV(3):6.
14.
21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 316.Orphan Drug Regulations: Final Rule; Federal Register. December 29, 1992.
15.
SpilkerB.Orphan Drug Act of 1983. Drug News Perspectives.1996;9(8):460–462.
16.
MyersA.Orphan drugs: The current situation in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Drug Inf J.1997;31(1):101–104.
17.
21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 316, 316.3(b) (12,13).
18.
ChewNMorganJWantowskiC.Taming the paper tiger at FDA. App Clin Trials.1998;7(2):36–40.
19.
HaffnerMEOrphan Drug development—International program and study design issues. Drug Inf J.1998;32:93–99.
20.
ShulmanSRManocchiaM.The US Orphan Drug Programme 1983–1995. Pharmacoeconomics.1997;12(3):312–326.
21.
PillarB.Orphan Products: drugs and devices for rare diseases. Nursing Econ.1993;11(2):99–102.
