Abstract
During 1930-1950, the purpose and content of corporate annual reports were vigorously debated in the business press. Using these writings as a case file, this research presents evidence that contradicts the received view that the Marketing Era post-dates 1950. The evidence strongly suggests that the reports themselves were marketed. Target audiences were identified and researched, and their needs and desires were respected in content, design, and distribu tion decisions. Furthermore, the debate over the reports' substantive content suggests that both product/service mar keting and social marketing were pervasive before 1950.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
