Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine a paradox in the marketing literature. This paradox concerns the commodity approach to marketing research. On the one hand, the com modity approach is perceived as obsolete. Few marketing journals or textbooks refer to it as a marketing research method. On the other hand, commodity based papers are still prominent in the marketing literature. Industrial pro ducts and the marketing of services are still the focus of a substantial amount of research. In order to empirically in vestigate the actual status of the commodity approach in scholarly marketing research, this paper presents a content analysis of articles appearing in the Journal of Marketing (1936-1989) and the AMA Proceedings (1957-1989). The goal of the content analysis is to measure how the adoption rate of the commodity approach has evolved over the past 54 years. Is the commodity approach as obsolete as it is perceived to be? Results show that (1) the adoption rate of the commodity approach is cyclical, (2) different com modities are studied more frequently in each of these cycles, and (3) current papers are more theoretical and less descrip tive than earlier papers adopting the commodity approach.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
