Abstract
Gravity theory holds that more people will travel from a particular origin to a given destination than will travel to a more distant destination of the same type and size. Distance, according to gravity theory is a deterrent to travel and empirical evidence supports such a relation ship in urban settings. This relationship is, however, hypothesized not to be true for long-distance leisure travel where distance may be a utility rather than a friction to be overcome.
This study examines the relationship between subjec tive (perceived) distance and objective (geographic) dis tance and tests the hypothesis that, all other things being equal, the attractiveness of tourist destinations will in crease as subjective distance increases. It is concluded that tourists tend to perceive all destinations to be closer than they actually are. It is also concluded that the far- off destination has a special allure about it simply be cause it is far-off.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
