Multidimensional analysis techniques such as ESSCA (External Single-set Components Analysis) are useful for marketing researchers who want to estimate the dimensionality of a group of related measurement instruments. Here, the advantages and disadvantages of this procedure are illustrated through an investigation of four advertising recall measures. The ESSCA solution suggests that two dimensions of recall are actually being measured: favorable recall of stimulus features and brand name recall.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abruzzini, Pompeo.1967. "Measuring Language Difficulty in Advertising Copy." Journal of Marketing31 (April): 22-26.
2.
Alpert, Mark I. and Robert A. Peterson .1972. "On the Interpretation of Canonical Correlation." Journal of Marketing Research9 (May): 187-192.
3.
Bagozzi, Richard P.1980. Causal Models in Marketing. New York : John Wiley and Sons.
4.
Bartos, Rena.1981. "Ads That Irritate May Erode Trust in Advertised Brands ." Harvard Business Review (May-June): 138-40.
5.
Bagozzi, Richard P. and Alvin J. Silk.1983. "Recall, Recognition, and the Measurement of Memory for Print Advertisements." Marketing Science. 2 (Spring): 95-134.
6.
Bower, Lawrence and Steven H. Chaffee : 1974. "Product Involvement and Pertinent Advertising Appeals." Journalism Quarterly51 (Winter): 613-21; 644.
7.
Buchanan, Dodds J.1964. "How Interest in the Product Affects Recall: Print Ads vs. Commercials." Journal of Advertising Research4: 9-14.
8.
Clark, Margaret S. and Alice M. Isen.1982. Cognitive Social Psychology. Albert Hostorf and Alice Isen, eds. New York: Elsevier/North Holland73.
9.
Claycamp, Henry J. and Lucien E. Liddy .1969. "Prediction of New Product Performance: An Analytical Approach." Journal of Marketing Research6 (November): 414-20.
10.
Etgar, Michael.1976. "Channel Domination and Countervailing Power in Distributive Channels." Journal of Marketing Research8: 254-262.
11.
Fornell, Claes.1978. "Three Approaches to Canonical Analysis." Journal of the Market Research Society20: 166-181.
Fornell, Claes and George M. Zinkhan .1982. "Classification Schemes for a Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis." in ( R. Bush and S. Hunt, eds.) Marketing Theory: Philosophy of Science Perspectives. Chicago: American Marketing Association: 295-99.
14.
Goodwin, Stephen and Michael Etgar.1980. "An Experimental Investigation of Comparative Advertising: Impact of Message Appeal, Information Load, and Utility of Product Class." Journal of Marketing Research17 (May): 187-202.
15.
Greenberg, Allen and Norton Garfinkle .1962. "Delayed Recall of Magazine Articles. Journal of Advertising Research2 (No. 1): 28-31.
16.
Hanssens, Dominique M: and Barton A. Weitz .1980. "The Effectiveness of Industrial Print Advertisements Across Product Categories." Journal of Marketing Research17: 294-306.
17.
Holbrook, Morris B.1975. "A Study of Communication in Advertising." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York, NY: Columbia University.
18.
Holbrook, Morris B. and Elizabeth C. Hirschman .1982. "The Experimental Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings and Fun." Journal of Consumer Research9 (September): 132-140.
19.
Janis, J. Harold.1978. Writing and Communication in Business. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc., Third Edition: 388-404.
20.
Joreskog, K.G.1969. "A General Approach to Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis." Psychometrika34: 183-202.
21.
Miller, J.K.1975. "The Sampling Distribution and a Test for the Significance of the Bimultivariate Redundancy Statistic: A Monte Carlo Study." Multivariate Behavioral Research10: 233-244.
22.
Mitchell, Andrew A. and Jerry C. Olson.1981. "Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?" Journal of Marketing Research16: 318-332.
23.
Saliagas, Dena.1985. "An Investigation of Affective Response: Applications to Advertising Communications." Unpublished dissertation, Houston, TX: University Houston.
24.
Scott, William A.1962. "Cognitive Complexity and Cognitive Flexibility." Sociometry25: 405-14.
25.
Shimp, Terence, A.1981. "Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice." Journal of Advertising10 (2): 91-5.
26.
Silk, Alvin J. and Terry Vavra.1974. Advertising's Affective Qualities and Consumer Response. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.
27.
Stewart, D. and W. Love.1968. "A General Canonical Correlation Index ." Psychological Bulletin70: 160-163.
28.
Taylor, Wilson L.1953. " 'Cloze Procedure': A New Tool for Measuring Readability ." Journalism Quarterly30: 415-33.
29.
van den Wollenberg, A.L.1977. "Redundancy Analysis: An Alternative for Canonical Correlation Analysis." Psychometricka42: 207-219.
30.
Westbrook, Robert A. and Claes Fornell.1979. "Patterns of Information Source Usage Among Durable Goods Buyers." Journal of Marketing Research16: 303-312.
31.
Zajonc, Robert B. and Hazel Markus. 1982. "Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preferences." Journal of Consumer Research9: 123-131.
32.
Zinkhan, George M.1982. "An Empirical Investigation of Aided Advertising Recall ." Current Issues and Research in Advertising5: 137-160.
33.
Zinkhan, George M. and Claude R.Martin. 1983. "Two Copy Testing Techniques: The Cloze Procedure and the Cognitive Complexity Test." Journal of Business Research11: 217-28.
34.
Zinkhan, George M., William B. Locander and James H. Leigh.1986. "Dimensional Relationships of Aided Recall and Recognition." Journal of Advertising15:1, 38-46.
