This article reviews the latest perceptions among
AACSB school professionals in the field of marketing
regarding journal hierarchies. With the proliferation
of marketing journals during the past few years comes
the need to address the relative position of all marketing
journals. This study lists journal rankings using prestige
and importance indices. The paper concludes with
a discussion on the relative importance of journal
rankings in the consideration of promotion and tenure
among faculty members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blunt, Peter.1976. "Publish or Perish or Neither: What is Happening in Academia ." Vestes19 (November): 62-64.
2.
Bohrer, Paul and Robert Dolphin, Jr.1985. "Expectations and Support for Scholarly Activity in Schools of Business." Journal of Education for Business61 (December): 101105.
3.
Browne, William G. and Boris W Becker.1985. "Perceptions of Marketing Journals: Awareness and Quality Evaluations," 1985 AMA Educator's Proceedings 51 (August): 149-154.
4.
Fry, Elaine Hobbs, C. Glenn Walters and Lawrence E. Scheurmann .1985. "Perceived Quality of Fifty Selected Journals: Academicians and Practitioners." Academy of Marketing Science 13 (Spring): 352-361.
5.
Gaston, Jerry, Herman R. Lantz and Charles R. Snyder .1975. "Publication Criteria for Promotion in Ph.D. Graduate Departments." American Sociologist10 (November): 239 - 242.
6.
McCullough, Charles D., Bob Wooten and John Ryan.1981. "Research and Publication Programs in Collegiate Schools of Business: A Faculty Development Approach." Journal of Business Education57 (November): 46-49.
7.
Seldin, Peter.1985. Current Practices in Evaluating Business School Faculty , Monograph Center for Applied Research, Pace University , (August).
