Alpert, B. (1967), "Non-Businessmen as Surrogates for Businessmen in Behavioral Experiments," Journal of Business, 40, 203-207.
2.
Cleavenger, T. , Jr.; G.A. Lazier; and M.L. Clark (1968), "The Influence of Certain Factors on Response to the Semantic Differential," Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 675-679.
3.
Cunningham, W.H. ; W.T. Anderson, Jr.; and J.H. Murphy (1974), "Are Students Real People?" Journal of Business, 47, 399-409.
4.
Dunne, P.; D. Lund; and V. Luchsinger (1980), "The Use of Students as Surrogates: A Jeopardy Game," Proceedings of the American Marketing Association , Chicago, II.
5.
Enis, B.M.; K.K. Cox; and J.E. Stafford (1972), "Students as Subjects in Consumer Behavior Experiments ," Journal of Marketing Research, 9,72-74.
6.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Hawkins, D.I. ; G. Albaum; and R. Best (1977), "An Investigation of Two Issues in the Use of Students as Surrogates for Housewives in Consumer Behavior Studies," Journal of Business, 50, 216-222.
8.
8Khera, LP and J.D. Benson (1970), "Are Students Really Poor Substitutes for Businessmen in Behavioral Research?" Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 529-532.
9.
Sheth, J.N. (1970), "Are There Differences in Dissonance Reduction Behavior Between Students and Housewifes?" Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 243-245.
10.
Shuptrine, F.K. (1975), "On the Validity of Using Students as Subjects in Consumer Behavior Investigations," Journal of Business, 48,383-390.