The Use of Telephone Dials as Attitude Scales: A Laboratory Experiment

Bendig, A.W. 1954. "Reliability and the Number of Rating Scales." The Journal of Applied Psychology 38, 38-40.

Campbell, Donald T. and Stanley, Julian C. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs forResearch.New York: Rand McNally.

Hughes, G. David 1967. "Selecting Scales to Measure Attitude Change." Journal of Marketing Research 4 (February) 85-87.

_ 1969. "Some Confounding Effects of Forced Choice Scales." Journal of Marketing Research 6 (May) 223-226.

Hawkins, Del I. , Albaum, Gerald and Best, Roger 1974. "Stapel Scale or Semantic Differential in Marketing Research . " Journal of Marketing Reserch 9 (August) 318-322.

Kassarjian, Harold H. and Nakanishi, Masao 1967. "A Study of Selected Opinion Measurement Techniques." Journal of Marketing Research 4 (May) 148-153.

Komorita, S.S. 1963. "Attitude Content, Intensity and the Neutral Point on a Likert Scale." The Journal of Social Psychology 61, 327-334.

Matell, Michael S. and Jacoby, Jacob , 1971. "Is There An Optimal Number of Alternatives For Likert Scale Items?" Study I: Reliability and Validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement 31, 657-674.

_, 1972. "Is There An Optimal Number of Alternatives for Likert Scale Items?" Journal of Applied Psychology 56 (December) 506-509.

" Polling: Growth Industry With Problems," (1975). U.S. News and World Report, (March 12),85-87.

Tull, Donald S. and Hawkins Del I. , 1976. Marketing Research: Meaning Measurement and Method, New York: MacMillan.

Upah, Gregory, D. , 1979. Effects of Product Complexity on Information Source Importance in Marketing Channels, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

Wheatley, John J. 1973. "Self-Administered Written Questionnaires or Telephone Interviews?" Journal of Marketing Research 10 (February) 94-96.