Alpert, M.I. and Anderson, W.T., Jr., 1973. "Optimal Heterophily and Communication Effectiveness: Some Empirical Findings." Journal of Communication23 (September) 328-343.
2.
Chambliss, W.J., 1965. "The Selection of Friends." Social Forces43 (March) 370-380.
3.
Clevenger, T., Jr., 1966. "The Model and the Problem in the Educational Setting," in P. E. Reid, ed. The Frontiers in Experimental Speech-Communication Research. Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University.
4.
Cohen, A.R., 1968. "Some Implications of Self-Esteem for Social Influence ," in C. Gordon and K. J. Gergen, eds. The Self in Social Interaction. New York: Wiley.
5.
Farnsworth, P.R., 1965. "A Social Effect on the Perception of Facial Resemblance." Journal ofSocial Psychology65 (April) 221-223.
6.
Jones, E.E. and Daugherty, B.N., 1959. "Political Orientation and the Perceptual Effects of an Anticipated Interaction' Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology59 (November) 340-349.
7.
Lazarsfeld, P.F. and Merton, R.K., 1954. "Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis," in M. Berger and others, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand.
8.
Lucas, D.B. and Britt, S.H., 1963. Measuring Advertising Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Newcomb, T.M., 1956. "The Prediction of Interpersonal Attraction." American Psychologist11 (November ) 575-586.
10.
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., and Tannenbaum, P.H. , 1957. The Measurement of Meaning . Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Rogers, E.M. and Bhowmik, D.K., 1970. "Homophily-Heterophily: Relational Concepts for Communication Research." Public Opinion Quarterly34 (Winter) 523-538.
