DiMaggio, Paul J.1995. “Comments on ‘What Theory Is Not.’” Administrative Science Quarterly40 (3): 391-397.
2.
Hunt, Shelby. 1990. “Truth in Marketing Theory and Research.” Journal of Marketing54 (July): 1-15.
3.
Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry. New York: Harper & Row.
4.
MacKenzie, Scott B.2003. “The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science31 (3): 323-327.
5.
Martineau, Pierre. 1957. Motivation in Advertising. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Secord, Paul. 1983. “Explanation in the Social Sciences and in Life Situations.” Paper presented at the University of Chicago Conference on Potentialities of Knowledge in the Social Sciences, September, Philadelphia.
7.
Smith, Wendell R.1956. “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies.”Journal of Marketing21 (1): 3-8.
8.
Sutton, Robert I. and Barry M. Staw. 1995. “What Theory Is Not.” Administrative Science Quarterly40 (3): 371-384.
9.
Weick, Karl E.1989. “Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination. Academy of Management Review14:516-531.
10.
Zinkhan, George M.2004. “Accessing Academic Research Through an E-Data Base: Issues of Journal Quality and Knowledge Use.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science32 (4): 369-370.
11.
Zinkhan, George M. and Rudy Hirschheim. 1992. “Truth in Marketing Theory and Research: An Alternative Perspective.”Journal of Marketing56 (April): 8088-8088.
12.
Zinkhan, George M., Martin Roth, and Mary Jane Saxton. 1992. “Knowledge Development and Scientific Status in Consumer Behavior Research: A Social Exchange Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research18 (September): 282-291.