It is widely recognized that a better understanding of interactivity and its implications is essential for facilitating research focused on the emerging electronic marketplace. However, deficiencies persist in our understanding of this important concept. Building on research in various fields of study (e.g., information systems, marketing, and computer-mediated communication), this article presents a conceptualization of interactivity from a marketplace perspective that is missing or inadequately articulated in the literature. Specifically, interactivity is conceptualized as a characteristic of computer-mediated communication in the marketplace that increases with the bidirectionality, timeliness, mutual controllability, and responsiveness of communication as perceived by consumers and firms. The article concludes with a research agenda focusing on issues relating to measurement, conceptual refinement, and management of interactivity in the electronic marketplace.
Alba, Joseph W., John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer, et al.1997. “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces.”Journal of Marketing61 (July): 38-53.
2.
Ariely, Dan. 2000. “Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers’ Decision Makingand Preferences.”Journalof Consumer Research27 (September): 233-248.
3.
Armstrong, Arthur and John Hagel III.1996. “The Real Value of On-line Communities.”Harvard Business Review74 (3): 1345-141.
4.
Bakos, J. Yannis. 1991. “A Strategic Analysis of Electronic Marketplaces.”MIS Quarterly15 (September): 295-310.
5.
Bakos, J. Yannis. 1997. “Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces.”Management Science43 (December): 1676-1692.
6.
Bezjian-Avery, Alexa, Bobby Calder, and Dawn Iacabucci. 1998. “New Media Interactive Advertising vs. Traditional Advertising.”Journal of Advertising Research38 (4): 23-32.
7.
Biocca, Frank. 1992. “Communication Within Virtual Reality: Creating a Space for Research.”Journal of Communication42 (4): 5-22.
8.
Blattberg, Robert C. and John Deighton. 1991. “Interactive Marketing: Exploiting the Age of Addressability.”Sloan Management Review33 (1): 5-14.
9.
Bretz, Rudy. 1983. Media for Interactive Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Brown, Jacqueline Johnson and Peter H. Reingen. 1987. “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research21 (September): 332-441.
11.
Burgoon, Judee K., Joseph A. Bonito, Bjorn Bengtsson, Artemio Ramirez Jr., E. Norah Dunbar, and Nathan Miczo. 1999. “Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work.”Journal of Management Information Systems16 (3): 33-56.
12.
Burgoon, Judee K., David B. Buller, and Kory Floyd. 2001. “Does Participation Affect Deception Success? A Test of the Interactivity Principle.”Human Communication Research27 (4): 503-534.
13.
Cairncross, Frances. 1997. The Death of Distance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
Culhan, M. J. and M. L. Markus. 1987. “Information Technologies.” In Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Eds. F. M. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, and L. Porter. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 420-443.
15.
Daft, Richard L. and Robert H. Lengel. 1986. “Organization Information Requirements, Media Richness, and Structural Determinants.”Management Science32 (5): 554-571.
16.
D’Aveni, Richard A.1999. “Strategic Supremacy Through Disruption and Dominance.”Sloan Management Review40 (3): 127-135.
17.
Deighton, John. 1997. “Commentary on ‘Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.’”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science25 (Fall): 347-351.
18.
Deighton, John. and Rashi Glazer. 1998. “From the Editors.”Journal of Interactive Marketing12 (1): 2-4.
19.
Downes, Edward J. and Sally J. McMillan. 2000. “Defining Interactivity: A Qualitative Identification of Key Dimensions.”New Media & Society2 (2): 157-179.
20.
Durlak, Jerome T.1987. “A Typology for Interactive Media.”Communication Yearbook10:743-757.
21.
Fidler, Roger. 1997. Mediamorphosis: Understanding the New Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
22.
Fortin, David R. 1997. “The Impact of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness in the New Media.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of Rhode Island.
23.
Frankos, Cassandra E. 2000. “Interactivity and Community: Social Interaction in an Online Community.” Thesis. California State University, Dominguez Hills.
24.
Frenzen, Jonathan K. and Harry L. Davis. 1990. “Purchasing Behavior in Embedded Markets.”Journal of Consumer Research17(June):1-12.
25.
Ghose, Sanjoy and Wenyu Dou. 1998. “Interactive Functions and Their Impacts on the Appeal of Internet Presence Sites.”Journal of Advertising Research38 (2): 29-43.
26.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Glazer, Rashi. 1991. “Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset.”Journal of Marketing55 (October): 1-19.
28.
Haeckel, Stephan H.1998. “About the Nature and Future of Interactive Marketing.”Journal of Interactive Marketing12 (1): 63-71.
29.
Hagel, John, III and Jeffrey F. Rayport. 1997. “The Coming Battle for Customer Information.”Harvard Business Review75 (January/February): 53-63.
30.
Haubl, Gerald and Valarie Trifts. 2000. “Consumer Decision Making in Online Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids.”Marketing Science19 (1): 4-21.
31.
Heeter, Carrie. 1989. “Implications of New Interactive Technologies for Conceptualizing Communication.” In Media Use in the Information Age. Eds. Jerry L. Salvaggio and Jennings Bryant. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 217-235.
32.
Heeter, Carrie. 2000. “Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences.”Journal of Interactive Advertising1 (1). Online journal: http://jiad.org.
33.
Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak. 1996. “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations.”Journal of Marketing60 (3): 50-68.
34.
Hoffman, Donna L. and Thomas P. Novak. 1997. “A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce.”Information Society13 (1): 43-54.
35.
Hsu, Huei-Ling. 1996. “Interactivity of Human-Computer Interaction and Personal Characteristics in a Hypermedia Learning Environment.” Dissertation. Stanford University.
36.
Iacabucci, Dawn. 1998. “Interactive Marketing and the Meganet: Networks of Networks.”Journal of Interactive Marketing12 (1): 5-16.
37.
Jaffe, Michael J. 1995. “Media Interactivity, Cognitive Flexibility, and Self-Efficacy.” Dissertation. University of Michigan.
38.
Jarvis, Cheryl Burke, Scott B. Mackenzie, and Philip M. Podsakoff. 2003. “A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research30 (September): 199-218.
39.
Johnson, Eric J.2001. “Digitizing Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research28 (2): 331-336.
40.
Kaplan, Steven and Mohanbir Sawhney. 2000. “E-Hubs: The New B2B Marketplaces.”Harvard Business Review78 (May/June): 97-103.
41.
Katz, Helen. 2000. “Interactivity in 2000: An Industry Viewpoint.”Journal of Interactive Advertising1 (1). Online journal: http://jiad.org.
42.
Kiesler, Sara, J. Siegel, and T. W. McGuire. 1984. “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.”American Psychologist39 (10): 1123-1134.
43.
Krugman, Dean M.1985. “Evaluating the Audiences of the New Media.”Journal of Advertising14 (4): 1-27.
44.
Krugman, Dean M.1988. “Telecommunication Services and Advertising: A Review ofthe Audiences and Research.”Current Issues & Research in Advertising11 (2): 331-350.
45.
Litan, Robert E. and William A. Niskanen. 1998. Going Digital. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press and Cato Press.
46.
Litan, Robert E. and Alice M. Rivlin. 2001. “Projecting the Economic Impact of the Internet.”The American Economic Review91 (2): 313-317.
47.
Liu, Yuping and L. J. Shrum. 2002. “What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness.”Journal of Advertising31 (4): 53-64.
48.
Lombard, Matthew and Theresa Ditton. 1997. “At the Heart of it All: The Concept of Presence.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication3 (2). Online journal: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/.
49.
Lombard, Matthew and Jennifer Snyder-Duch. 2001. “Interactive Advertising and Presence: A Framework.”Journal of Interactive Advertising1 (2). Online journal: http://jiad.org.
50.
Lynch, John and Dan Ariely. 2000. “Wine Online: Search Costs and Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution.”Marketing Science19 (1): 83-103.
51.
Malone, Thomas W.1997. “Is Empowerment Just a Fad? Control, Decision Making, and IT.”Sloan Management Review38 (2): 23-35.
52.
Meuter, Matthew L., Amy L. Ostrom, Robert I. Roundtree, and Mary Jo Bitner. 2000. “Self-Serve Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction With Technology-Based Service Encounters.”Journal of Marketing64 (3): 50-64.
53.
MacInnis, Deborah J., Christine Moorman, and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1991. “Enhancing and Measuring Consumer’s Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information From Ads.”Journal of Marketing55 (October): 32-53.
54.
McMillan, Sally J. and Jang-Sun Hwang. 2002. “Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity.”Journal of Advertising31 (3): 29.
55.
Mundorf, Norbert and Jennings Bryant. 2002. “Realizing the Social and Commercial Potential of Interactive Technologies.”Journal of Business Research55 (8): 665-670.
56.
Nass, Clifford and Youngme Moon. 2000. “Machines and Mindfulness: Social Responses to Computers.”Journal of Social Issues56 (1): 81-103.
57.
Nass, Clifford, Youngme Moon., John Morkes, Eun-Young Kim, and B. J. Fogg. 1997. “Computers Are Social Actors: A Review of Current Research.” In Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. Ed. Batya Friedman. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
58.
Novak, Thomas P., Donna L. Hoffman, and Yiu-Fai Yung. 2000. “Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach.”Marketing Science19 (1): 22-42.
59.
Odlyzko, Andre. 2001. “The Myth of ‘Internet Time.’”Technology Review, 104 (3): 92-93.
60.
O’Guinn, Thomas C. and Ronald J. Faber. 1991. “Mass Communication and Consumption Behavior.” In Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Eds. Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 349-400.
61.
Oliver, Jim R.1996. “A Machine-Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce.”Journal of Management Information Systems13 (3): 83-112.
62.
Peterson, Robert A., Sridhar Balasubramanian, and Bart J. Bronnenberg. 1997. “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science25 (Fall): 329-346.
63.
Postemes, Tom, Russell Spears, and Martin Lea. 1998. “Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication.”Communication Research25 (6): 689-715.
64.
Rafaeli, Sheizaf. 1988. “Interactivity: From New Media to Communication.”Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science16:110-134.
65.
Rafaeli, Sheizaf. and Fay Sudweeks. 1997. “Networked Interactivity.”Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication2 (4). Online journal: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/.
66.
Reeves, Byron and Clifford I. Nass. 1996. The Media Equation. Stanford, CA: SSLI Publications.
67.
Rice, Ronald E.1987. “Computer-Mediated Communication and Organizational Innovation.”Journal of Communication37 (4): 65-94.
68.
Rogers, Everette M.1986. Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. New York: Free Press.
69.
Sanchez, Ron and Joseph T. Mahoney. 1996. “Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design.”Strategic Management Journal17 (Winter): 63-76.
70.
Shannon, Claude E. and Warren Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
71.
Short, John A.1974. “Effect of Medium of Communication on Experimental Negotiation.”Human Relations27:225-234.
72.
Short, John A., E. Williams, and B. Christie. 1976. The Social Psychology of Telecommunication. New York: John Wiley.
73.
Sinha, Indrajit. 2000. “Cost Transparency: The Net’s Real Threat to Prices and Brands.”Harvard Business Review78(March/April):3-8.
74.
Soukup, Charles. 2000. “Building a Theory of Multi-Media CMC.”New Media & Society2 (4): 407-425.
75.
Spar, Debora and Jeffrey J. Bussbang. 1996. “Ruling the Net.”Harvard Business Review74 (May/June): 125-133.
76.
Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler. 1986. “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.”Management Science32 (11): 1492-1512.
Stewart, David and Paul A. Pavlou. 2002. “From Consumer Response to Active Consumer: Measuring the Effectiveness of Interactive Media” [Special issue]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science30 (4): 376-398.
79.
Tedlow, Richard S.1990. New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America. New York: Basic Books.
80.
Trevino, Linda Klebe, Richard L. Daft, and Robert H. Lengel. 1990. “Understanding Managers’ Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” In Organizations and Communications Technology. Eds. Janet Fulk and Charles Charles Steinfield. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 71-94.
81.
Urban, Glen L.2004. “The Emerging Era of Customer Advocacy.”Sloan Management Review45 (2): 77-82.
82.
Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Manjit S. Yadav. 2002. “Marketing Strategy and the Internet: An Organizing Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science30 (4): 296-313.
83.
Walther, Joseph B.1992a. “Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction.”Communication Research19 (1): 52-90.
84.
Walther, Joseph B.1992b. “Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction.”Human Communication Research19 (1): 50-88.
85.
Walther, Joseph B.1994. “Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction.”Human Communication Research20 (4): 473-501.
86.
Walther, Joseph B.1996. “Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction.”Communication Research23 (1): 3-43.
87.
Walther, Joseph B., Jefferey F. Anderson, and David W. Park. 1994. “Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Meta-Analysis of Social and Antisocial Communication.”Communication Research21 (4): 460-487.
88.
Ware, James, Judity Gebauer, Amir Hartman, and Malu Roldan. 1998. The Search for Digital Excellence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
89.
Yadav, Manjit S. and Rajan Varadarajan. 2005. “Understanding Product Migration to the Electronic Marketplace: A Conceptual Framework.”Journal of Retailing81 (2): 125-140.
