Studies that rank the relative quality of scholarly marketing journals have relied primarily on expert opinion surveys and citation analyses. The authors use a new approach that combines elements of these two alternatives and compile a database of 6,294 citations (representing 3,423 different articles) from 109 syllabi obtained from a broad sampling of AACSB-International-accredited schools with marketing doctoral programs. The five most cited journals (Journal of Marketing, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing Research, Marketing Science, and Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science) account for 66.5 percent of citations in the syllabi. Rankings of journals other than the top five vary markedly from previous journal quality studies. Few articles are cited in common across programs, and the authors find considerable variation even within individual seminar types. The findings provide a new basis for assessing the quality of journals and provide new insights about the content of doctoral programs.
jAACSB International. 1997. AACSB 1997/1998 Membership Directory. St. Louis, MO: American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business.
2.
AMA Task Force on the Development of Marketing Thought. 1988. “Developing, Disseminating, and Utilizing Marketing Knowledge”. Journal of Marketing52 (October): 1-25.
3.
Arnold, Tom, Alexander W. Butler, Timothy Falcon Crack, and Ayca Altintig. 2003. “Impact: What Influences Finance Research?”Journal of Business76(2): 343-361.
4.
Bakir, Aysen, Scott J. Vitell, and GregoryM. Rose. 2000.“Publicationsin Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Scholars and Marketing Departments”. Journal of Marketing Education22(2): 99-107.
5.
Baumgartner, Hans and Rik Pieters. 2003. “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and Its Subareas Over Time”. Journal of Marketing67(April): 123-139.
6.
Bergen, Mark, Shantanu Dutta, and Orville Walker. 1992. “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories”. Journal of Marketing56(July): 1-24.
7.
Bettencourt, Lance A. and Mark B. Houston. 2001. “Reference Diversity in JCR, JM, and JMR: A Reexamination and Extension of Tellis, Chandy, and Ackerman (1999)”. Journal of Consumer Research28(September): 313-323.
8.
Browne, William G. and Boris W. Becker. 1979. “Perceived Quality of Marketing Journals”. Journal of Marketing Education1(November): 6-15.
9.
Browne, William G. and Boris W. Becker. 1985. “Perceptions of Marketing Journals: Awareness and Quality Evaluations.” In AMA Educators’Proceedings. Ed. Robert Fx. Lusch. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 149-154.
10.
Browne, William G. and Boris W. Becker. 1991. “A Longitudinal Study of Marketing Journal Familiarity and Quality.” In AMA Educators’Proceedings. Ed. Mary C. Gilly. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 702-710.
11.
Capella, Louis and Ronald Taylor. 1989. “Marketing Theory Courses: A Longitudinal Analysis.” In Proceedings of the Southern Marketing Association. Ed. Robert King. Charleston, SC: Southern Marketing Association, 242-246.
12.
Chandy, P. R. and Thomas G. E. Williams. 1994. “The Impact of Journals and Authors on International Business Research: A Citational Analysis of JIBS Articles”. Journal of International Business Studies25(4): 715-728.
13.
Coe, Robert K. and Irwin Weinstock. 1983. “Evaluating Journal Publications of Marketing Professors: A Second Look”. Journal of Marketing Education5(Spring): 37-42.
14.
Corrado, Charles J. and Stephen P. Ferris. 1997. “Journal Influence on the Design of Finance Doctoral Education”. Journal of Finance52(5): 2091-2102.
15.
Cote, Joseph A., Siew Meng Leong, and Jane Cote. 1991. “Assessing the Influence of the Journal of Consumer Research: A Citation Analysis”. Journal of Consumer Research18(3): 402-410.
16.
Danneels, Erwin and Gary L. Lilien. 1998. “Doctoral Programs in Business-to-Business Marketing: Status and Prospects”. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing5 (1/2): 7-34.
17.
DuBois, Frank L. and David Reeb. 2000. “Ranking the International Business Journals”. Journal of International Business Studies31(4): 689-704.
18.
Fry, Elaine Hobbs, C. Glenn Walters, and Lawrence E. Scheuermann. 1985. “Perceived Quality of Fifty Selected Journals: Academicians and Practitioners”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science13(Spring): 352-361.
19.
Goldman, Arieh. 1979. “Publishing Activity in Marketing as an Indicator of Its Structure and Disciplinary Boundaries”. Journal of Marketing Research16(4): 485-494.
20.
Guidry, Julie Anna, Brandi N. Guidry Hollier, Linda Johnson, John R. Tanner, and Christiane Veltsos. 2004. “Surveying the Cites: A Ranking of Marketing Journals Using Citation Analysis”. Marketing Education Review14(1): 45-59.
21.
Hamelman, Paul W. and Edward M. Mazze. 1973. “Cross-Referencing Between AMA Journals and Other Publications”. Journal of Marketing Research10(May): 215-218.
22.
Hawes, Jon M. and Bruce Keillor. 2002. “Assessing Marketing Journals: A Mission-Based Approach”. Journal of the Academy of Business Education3(Fall): 70-86.
23.
Heischmidt, Kenneth A. and Peter J. Gordon. 1993.“Rating of Marketing Publications: Impact of Accreditation and Publication History”. Journal of Education for Business68(January/February): 152-158.
24.
Hoffman, Donna L. and Morris B. Holbrook. 1993. “The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research”. Journal of Consumer Research19(March): 505-517.
25.
Hult, G.Tomas M., William T. Neese, and R. Edward Bashaw. 1997. “Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals”. Journal of Marketing Education19(1): 37-52.
26.
Jobber, David and Paul Simpson. 1988. “A Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals”. International Journal of Research in Marketing5(2): 137-142.
27.
Joswick, Kathleen E., Ronald J. Bauerly, and Don T. Johnson. 2004. “Assessing Marketing Literature: A Study of the Readings Assigned in Doctoral Seminars in Marketing”. College & Research Libraries65(5): 384-398.
28.
Koojaroenprasit, Narong, Art Weinstein, William C. Johnson, and David O. Remington. 1998. “Marketing Journal Rankings Revisited: Research Findings and Academic Implications”. Marketing Education Review8(1): 95-102.
29.
Kotler, Philip. 1972. “A Generic Concept of Marketing”. Journal of Marketing36(April): 46-54.
30.
Kurtz, David L., Anne M. Velliquette, Judith A. Garretson, Subhas Dhodapkar, and Jeanne Olson. 1997. “An Evaluation of the Marketing Theory Seminar in Ph.D. Programs: Teaching Alternatives and Future Directions”. Marketing Education Review7(2): 1-15.
31.
Lazer, William. 1976. “Contributions to the Marketing Literature”. Journal of Marketing40(July): 74-78.
32.
Leong, Siew Meng. 1989. “A Citation Analysis of the Journal of Consumer Research”. Journal of Consumer Research15(March): 492-497.
33.
Leong, Siew Meng, Swee Hoon Ang, and Joseph A. Cote. 1992. “Knowledge Developmentin Marketing: A Citation Analysis Perspective.” In AMA Winter Educators’ Proceedings. Eds. Chris T. Allen and Thomas J. Madden. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 295-305.
34.
Luke, Robert H. and E. Reed Doke. 1987. “Marketing Journal Hierarchies and Faculty Perceptions, 1986-1987”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science15 (1): 74-78.
35.
Moran, Eric. 2004. “Publisher’s Report 2004”. Paper presented at the conference of the Academy of Marketing Science, May 26-29, Vancouver, Canada.
36.
Pasadeos, Yorgo. 1985. “A Bibliometric Study of Advertising Citations”. Journal of Advertising Research14(4): 52-59.
37.
Phillips, Diane M., Hans Baumgartner, and Rik Pieters. 1999. “Influence in the Evolving Citation Network of the Journal of Consumer Research.” In Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 26. Eds. Eric J. Arnould and Linda H. Scott. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 203-210.
38.
Pieters, Rik and Hans Baumgartner. 2002. “Who Talks to Whom? Intraand Interdisciplinary Communication of Economics Journals”. Journal of Economic Literature40(June): 483-509.
39.
Pieters, Rik, Jeroen Vermont, and Tammy Bijmolt. 1999. “Importance and Similarity in the Evolving Citation Network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing”. International Journal of Research in Marketing16(2): 113-127.
40.
Polonsky, Michael, J., Gary Jones, and Megan J. Kearsley. 1999. “Accessibility, an Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals”. Journal of Marketing Education21(3): 181-193.
41.
Rogers, Michael. 2001. “EBSCO Greatly Expanding Business Journal Back Files”. Library Journal, May 15, 29-30.
42.
Salancik, Gerald R.1986. “An Index of Subgroup Influence in Dependency Networks”. Administrative Science Quarterly31(June): 194-211.
43.
Simonson, Itamar, Ziv Carmon, Ravi Dhar, Aimee Drolet, and Stephen M. Nowlis. 2001. “Consumer Research: In Search of Identity”. Annual Review of Psychology52:249-275.
44.
Sprott, David E. and Anthony D. Miyazaki. 2002. “Two Decades of Contributions to Marketing and Public Policy: An Analysis of Research Published in Journal of Public Policy & Marketing”. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing21(1): 105-125.
45.
Tellis, Gerard J., Rajesh K. Chandy, and David S. Ackerman. 1999. “In Search of Diversity: The Record of Major Marketing Journals”. Journal of Marketing Research36(February): 120-131.
46.
Theoharakis, Vasalis and Andrew Hirst. 2002.“Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective”. Marketing Letters13(4): 389-402.
47.
Urbanic, Frank R. and J. Franklin Sailors. 1996. “Marketing Journals: A Study of University Library Holdings”. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship2(2): 17-33.
48.
U.S. News & World Report. 2001. “Top 50 Graduate Schools of Business.” April 9, 68-68.
49.
Wilkie, William L. and Elizabeth S. Moore. 1999. “Marketing’s Contributions to Society”. Journal of Marketing63(Special Issue): 198-218.
50.
Wilkie, William L. and Elizabeth S. Moore. 2003. “Scholarly Research in Marketing: Exploring the ‘4 Eras’ of Thought Development”. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing22(2): 116-146.
51.
Zinkhan, George M.2004. “Accessing Academic Research Through an E-Database: Issues of Journal Quality and Knowledge Use”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science32(4): 1-2.
52.
Zinkhan, George M. and Thomas W. Leigh. 1999. “Assessing the Quality Rankings of the Journal of Advertising, 1986-1997”. Journal of Advertising28(2): 51-70.
53.
Zinkhan, George M., Martin S. Roth, and Mary Jane Saxton. 1992. “Knowledge Development and Scientific Status in Consumer-Behavior Research: A Social Exchange Perspective”. Journal of Consumer Research19(September): 282-291.
54.
Zinkhan, George M., Mary Jane Saxton, Martin S. Roth, and Gerald Zaltman. 1990. “A Citation Analysis of the ACR Proceedings: A Knowledge Development and Social Exchange Perspective.” In Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17. Eds. Marvin E. Goldberg, Gerald Gorn, and Richard W. Pollay. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 627-653.
