Arnold, J. (1978). Let's discuss teaching strategies. Journal of Nursing Education, 17, 15-20.
2.
Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
3.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4.
de Tornyay, R. (1972). Individualizing instruction in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 11, 2-3.
5.
Fisher, K. , & MacWhinney, B. (1976). AV autotutorial instruction: A review of the evaluative research. A VCR, 24, 229-261.
6.
Frankenburg, W. K. , Camp, B. W., & Van Natta, P. A. (1971). Validity of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Child Development, 42, 475-485.
7.
Frankenburg, W. K. , Camp, B. W., Van Natta, P. A., & Demersseman, J. A. (1971). Reliability and stability of the Denver Developmental Screening Test. Child Development, 42, 1315-1325.
8.
Frankenburg, W. K. , Dodds, J. B., & Fandal, A. W. (1973). Denver Developmental Screening Test: A manual workbookfor nursing andparamedicalpersonnel. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Center.
9.
Frankenburg, W. K. , Dodds, J. B., Fandal, A. W., Kazuk, E., & Cohrs, M. (1975). Denver Developmental Screening Test reference manual. Denver: University of Colorado Medical Center.
10.
Huckabay, L. M. , Cooper, P. G., & Neal, M. C. (1977). Effects of specific teaching techniques on cognitive learning, transfer of learning, and affective behavior of nurses in an in-service education setting. Nursing Research, 26, 380-385.
11.
Jamison, D. , Suppes, P., & Wells, S. (1974). The effectiveness of alternative instructional media: A survey. Review of Educational Research, 44, 1-68.
12.
Karuhije, H. F. (1978). A performance-based evaluation of a unit ofprogrammed instruction in nursing education. Ed.D. dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
13.
Krueger, E. (1964). The administration of a hypodermic injection: An instance of programmed instruction. Ed.D. dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University.
14.
McKeachie, W. J. (1970). Research on college teaching: A review. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED No. 043 789.
15.
Mintzes, J. (1975). The A-T approach 14 years later: A review of recent research. Journal of College Science Teaching, 4, 247-252.
16.
Murray, L. M. (1983). A comparison of lecture-discussion and self-study methods in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education, 21, 17-23.
17.
Osborn, W. P. , & Thompson, M. A. (1976). Variables associated with student mastery of learning modules. Communicating Nursing Research, 9, 167-179.
18.
Pensivy, B. (1977). Traditional versus individualized nursing instruction: Comparison of state board examination scores as a result of these two methods of nursing instruction. Journal of Nursing Education, 16, 14-18.
19.
Postlethwait, S. N. , Novak, J., & Murray, H. T., Jr. (1972). The audio-tutorial approach to learning through independent study and integrated experiences. Minneapolis, Burgess.
20.
Quiring, J. (1972). The autotutorial approach: Effect of timing of videotape feedback on sophomore nursing students' achievement of skill in giving subcutaneous injections. Nursing Research, 21, 332-337.
21.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
22.
Stein, R. , Stell, L., Fuller, M., & Langhoff, H. (1972). A multimedia independent approach for improving the teaching learning process in nursing. Nursing Research, 21, 436-446.
23.
Thompson, M. (1972). Learning: A comparison of traditional and autotutorial methods. Nursing Research, 21, 453-457.
24.
Twaite, J. , & Monroe, J. (1979). Introductory statistics. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
