Computational literacy, broadly defined as having the skills and knowledge to use computing technology, provides new avenues for students to connect sociological concepts with empirical cases. However, integrating computational literacy into undergraduate sociology curricula presents logistical and other challenges for instructors. This article explores how to overcome these challenges by using software to integrate computational skill building into existing topical courses. A case study of a social network analysis course is presented to illustrate this integration in practice. Although students’ experiences in this course were positive, we identify key difficulties in administering the course, such as time constraints and students’ varied computational expertise. We discuss recommendations for overcoming these difficulties and conclude that developing computational literacy in topical electives is possible. Such an approach provides students new ways to engage with complex social issues.
BechhoferFrank. 1996. “Quantitative Research in British Sociology: Has It Changed Since 1981?”Sociology30(3):583–91. doi:10.1177/0038038596030003010.
3.
BestEricMallinsonDaniel J.2024. “Quantitative Political Science Education in the Past and Future.” Journal of Political Science Education20(4):637–49. doi:10.1080/15512169.2023.2260034.
4.
BivandRogerMilloGiovanniPirasGianfranco. 2021. “A Review of Software for Spatial Econometrics in R.” Mathematics9(11):1276. doi:10.3390/math9111276.
5.
BocconiStefaniaChioccarielloAugustoDettoriGiulianaFerrariAnuscaEngelhardtKatjaKampylisPanagiotisPunieYves. 2016. “Exploring the Field of Computational Thinking as a 21st Century Skill.” Pp. 4725–33 in EDULEARN Proceedings. Valencia, Spain: IATED Academy. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2016.2136.
6.
BuckleyJenniferBrownMarkThomsonStephanieOlsenWendyCarterJackie. 2015. “Embedding Quantitative Skills into the Social Science Curriculum: Case Studies from Manchester.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(5):495–510. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1062624.
7.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. 2024. Occupational Outlook Handbook, Sociologists. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
8.
ChamberlainJohn Martyn. 2017. “Ensuring the Criminological Skills of the Next Generation: A Case Study on the Importance of Enhanced Quantitative Method Teaching Provision.” Journal of Further and Higher Education41(4):448–59. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2015.1117602.
9.
ConawayBrookeClarkChristopherAriasJ. J.FolkJessie. 2018. “Integrating Econometrics: A Modern Undergraduate Economics Capstone Experience.” The Journal of Economic Education49(3):260–70. doi:10.1080/00220485.2018.1464986.
10.
CsardiGaborNepuszTamas. n.d. “The Igraph Software Package for Complex Network Research.” https://igraph.org/.
11.
CulattaElizabethPowell-WilliamsMelissaDaviesKim. 2024. “Preparing for Medical School: How Sociology Helps Premedical Students Prepare for the MCAT and Beyond.” Teaching Sociology52(1):27–38. doi:10.1177/0092055x231169754.
12.
EdelmannAchimWolffTomMontagneDanielleBailChristopher A.2020. “Computational Social Science and Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology46(1). doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054621.
13.
FosterMichaelDunhamMatthewCammarotaChristianVerostekMikeZwicklBenWongTony E.2024. “Toward an Assessment of Students’ (Social) Computational Literacy.” Pp. 181–84 in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2024, edited by Clarke-MiduraJ.KollarI.GuX.D’AngeloC.Ann Arbor, MI: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
14.
HealyKieran. 2019. Data Visualization: A Practical Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
HealyKieran. 2023. gssr: General Social Survey data for use in R. R package version 0.7.0. http://kjhealy.github.io/gssr.
16.
HoganBernie. 2022. From Social Science to Data Science: Key Data Collection and Analysis Skills in Python. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
HunterDavidHandcockMarkButtsCarterGoodreauStevenMorrisMartina. 2008. “Ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks.” Journal of Statistical Software24:nihpa54860. doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i03.
18.
JanulisPatrickPhillipsGregoryMelvilleJoshuaHoganBernieBannerKateMustanskiBrianOserCarrie B.TillsonMarthaSchneiderJohnBirkettMichelle. 2023. “Network Canvas: An Open-Source Tool for Capturing Social and Contact Network Data.” International Journal of Epidemiology52(4):1286–91. doi:10.1093/ije/dyad036.
19.
JohnsonAmy L.GleitRebecca D.2022. “Teaching for a Data-Driven Future: Intentionally Building Foundational Computing Skills.” Teaching Sociology50(1):49–61. doi:10.1177/0092055X211033632.
20.
KesariAniketKimJae YeonShahSonoBrownTaylorVenturaTiagoLawTina. 2024. “Training Computational Social Science PhD Students for Academic and Non-academic Careers.” PS: Political Science & Politics57(1):101–06. doi:10.1017/S1049096523000732.
21.
KongSiu-CheungAbelsonHarold, eds. 2022. Computational Thinking Education in K–12: Artificial Intelligence Literacy and Physical Computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22.
KrivitskyPavelHandcockMarkHunterDavidButtsCarterBojanowskiMichalKlumbChadGoodreauStevenMorrisMartina. 2024. “Statnet: Tools for the Statistical Modeling of Network Data.” http://statnet.org.
23.
LazerDavidPentlandAlexAdamicLadaAralSinanBarabásiAlbert-LászlóBrewerDevonChristakisNicholas, et al. 2009. “Computational Social Science.” Science323(5915):721–23. doi:10.1126/science.1167742.
24.
LuscombeAlexDickKevinWalbyKevin. 2022. “Algorithmic Thinking in the Public Interest: Navigating Technical, Legal, and Ethical Hurdles to Web Scraping in the Social Sciences.” Quality & Quantity56(3):1023–44. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01164-0.
25.
MacyMichael W.WillerRobert. 2002. “From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling.” Annual Review of Sociology28(1):143–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117.
26.
McElreathRichard. 2018. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
27.
MelroAnaTarlingGeorgieFujitaTaroStaarmanJudith Kleine. 2023. “What Else Can Be Learned When Coding? A Configurative Literature Review of Learning Opportunities through Computational Thinking.” Journal of Educational Computing Research61(4):901–24. doi:10.1177/07356331221133822.
28.
MolinaMarioGaripFiliz. 2019. “Machine Learning for Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology45(1):27–45. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041106.
29.
NelimarkkaMatti. 2023. Computational Thinking and Social Science: Combining Programming, Methodologies and Fundamental Concepts. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
30.
OlsenLauren D.2016. “‘It’s on the MCAT for a Reason’: Premedical Students and the Perceived Utility of Sociology.” Teaching Sociology44(2):72–83. doi:10.1177/0092055x15624744.
31.
PebesmaEdzerBivandRoger. 2023. Spatial Data Science: With Applications in R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
32.
R Core Team. 2021. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” https://www.R-project.org/.
33.
RawlingsCraig M.SmithJeffrey A.MoodyJamesMcFarlandDaniel A.2023. Network Analysis: Integrating Social Network Theory, Method, and Application with R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
RichPeter J.LangtonMatthew B.2016. “Computational Thinking: Toward a Unifying Definition.” Pp. 229–42 in Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age, edited by SpectorJ. M.IfenthalerD.SampsonD. G.IsaiasP.Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
SalganikMatthew J.2018. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
SchmiederChristian. 2020. “Qualitative Data Analysis Software as a Tool for Teaching Analytic Practice: Towards a Theoretical Framework for Integrating QDAS into Methods Pedagogy.” Qualitative Research20(5):684–702. doi:10.1177/1468794119891846.
38.
SeguinCharlesNierobiszAnnetteKozlowskiKaren Phelan. 2017. “Seeing Race: Teaching Residential Segregation with the Racial Dot Map.” Teaching Sociology45(2):142–51. doi:10.1177/0092055X16682303.
39.
TekdalMehmet. 2021. “Trends and Development in Research on Computational Thinking.” Education and Information Technologies26(5):6499–529. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w.
40.
UptonElizabethCaiXizhenJakielaPamelaOzierOwenRamanShyam. 2025. “The Software behind the Stats: A Student Exploration of Software Trends across Disciplines.” arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.06507.
WickhamHadley. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
43.
WingJeannette M.2006. “Computational Thinking.” Communications of the ACM49(3):33–35. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215.
44.
WolffTomMorganJonathan HowardVarelaGabrielLeleKieranBhojaniEthanPasqualeDana K.MuchaPeter J.MoodyJames. 2024. “ideanet: Integrating Data Exchange and Analysis for Networks.” R package version 1.1.1. doi:10.32614/CRAN.package.ideanet
45.
ZingaroDaniel. 2024. Algorithmic Thinking: Learn Algorithms to Level up Your Coding Skills. 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
46.
ZuberiTukufuBonilla-SilvaEduardo, eds. 2008. White Logic, White Methods: Racism and Methodology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
