We report on a cross-disciplinary collaboration between sociology and mathematics education to more effectively cultivate quantitative literacy (QL) in the introductory sociology course. Focusing on an instructional unit presenting the Gini coefficient (the most commonly used summary measure of income inequality), we engaged in iterative cycles of presentation, assessment, and redesign across four semester-long courses. Assessments were guided by insights from mathematics education—such as the procedural/conceptual distinction, student misconceptions, and student noticing—and characterized by extensive informal discussion and analysis of patterns in student exam responses. Assessments were formalized via coding of specific response elements and used to identify strategic foci for revision and redesign (including creating a brief instructional video series and an active learning exercise). In this article, we highlight the value of cross-disciplinary collaboration in QL pedagogy, demonstrate the effectiveness of analyzing specific elements and patterns of student comprehension to revise pedagogical presentation, and advocate for the strategic utility of the Gini coefficient for cultivating QL in introductory sociology.
AtkinsonMaxine P.CzajaRonaldBrewsterZachary. 2006. “Integrating Sociological Research into Large Introductory Courses: Learning Content and Increasing Quantitative Literacy.” Teaching Sociology34(1):54–64.
2.
BanchoffThomasSalemAnita. 2002. “Bridging the Divide: Research Versus Practice in Current Mathematics Teaching and Learning.” Pp. 181–96 in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, edited by HuberM. T.MorrealeS. P.Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.
3.
BestJoel. 2018. “Questioning Quintiles: Implications of Choices of Measures for Income Inequality and Social Mobility.” Numeracy11(2):6. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.11.2.6.
4.
BurdetteAmy M.McLoughlinKerry. 2010. “Using Census Data in the Classroom to Increase Quantitative Literacy and Promote Critical Sociological Thinking.” Teaching Sociology38(3):247–57.
CondronDennis J.BeckerJacob H.BzhetajLinda. 2018. “Sources of Students’ Anxiety in a Multidisciplinary Social Statistics Course.” Teaching Sociology46(4):346–55.
7.
DeCesareMichael. 2007. “Statistics Anxiety’ among Sociology Majors: A First Diagnosis and Some Treatment Options.” Teaching Sociology35(4):360–67.
8.
DowneyDennis J.ErnestJ. BrookeMcGarryMichael. 2017. “Understanding the Gini Coefficient: From Conceptual Foundations to Quantitative Measure.” Instructional Video Series and Associated Materials. TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
9.
ElrodSusan. 2014. “Quantitative Reasoning: The Next ‘Across the Curriculum’ Movement.” Peer Review16(3):4–8.
10.
ErnestPaul. 1998. “A Postmodern Perspective on Research in Mathematics Education.” Pp. 71–85 in Mathematics Education as a Research Domain: A Search for Identity, edited by SierpinskaA.KilpatrickJ.Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11.
FischerForest. 2019. “What Do We Mean by Quantitative Literacy?” Pp. 3–14 in Shifting Contexts, Stable Core, edited by TunstallL.KaraaliG.PierceyV.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
12.
FreemanScottEddySarah L.McDonoughMilesSmithMichelle K.OkoroaforNnadozieJordtHannahWenderothMary Pat. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(23):8410–15.
13.
FriedrichJamesStrawnKelley. 2019. “Using Meta-analysis to Assess Affective Outcomes in a Multi-course QR Module Intervention.” Numeracy12(2):8. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.12.2.8.
14.
GanterSusan L.2006. “Issues, Policies, and Activities in the Movement for Quantitative Literacy.” Pp. 11–15 in Current Practices in Quantitative Literacy, edited by GillmanR.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
15.
HammanKiraPierceyVictorTunstallSamuel L.2019. “Numeracy and Social Justice: A Wide, Deep, and Longstanding Intersection.” Numeracy12(1):2. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.12.1.2.
16.
HerdaDaniel. 2017. “Correcting Misperceptions: An In-class Exercise for Reducing Population Innumeracy Using Student Response Systems and a Test of Its Effectiveness.” Teaching Sociology45(2):152–60.
17.
HiebertJamesLefevrePatricia. 1986. “Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis.” Pp. 1–27 in Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics, edited by HiebertJ.Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
18.
HoweryCarla B.2002. “The Culture of Teaching in Sociology.” Pp. 143–59 in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, edited by HuberM. T.MorrealeS. P.Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.
19.
HoweryCarla B.RodriguezHavidan. 2006. “Integrating Data Analysis (IDA): Working with Sociology Departments to Address the Quantitative Literacy Gap.” Teaching Sociology34(1):23–38.
20.
HuberMary TaylorMorrealeSherwyn P.2002. “Situating the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: A Cross-Disciplinary Conversation.” Pp. 1–24 in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, edited by HuberM. T.MorrealeS. P.Herndon, VA: Stylus Publishing.
21.
Hughes-HallettDeborah. 2003. “The Role of Mathematics Courses in the Development of Quantitative Literacy.” Pp. 91–98 in Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges, edited by MadisonB.SteenL. A.Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
LinderAndrew M.2012. “Teaching Quantitative Literacy through a Regression Analysis of Exam Performance.” Teaching Sociology40(1):50–59.
24.
LinnemanThomas J.2021. “From Measures of Association to Multilevel Models: Sociology Journals and the Quantitative Literacy Gap.” Teaching Sociology49(1):45–57.
25.
LobatoJoanne. 2008. “When Students Don’t Apply the Knowledge You Think They Have, Rethink Your Assumptions about Transfer.” Pp. 289–304 in Making the Connection: Research and Teaching in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, edited by CarlsonM. P.RasmussenC.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
26.
LobatoJoanneHohenseeCharlesRhodehamelBohdan. 2013. “Students’ Mathematical Noticing.” Journal for Research in Mathematical Education44(5):809–50.
27.
LunaYvonne M.WintersStephanie A.2017. “‘Why Did You Blend My Learning?’ A Comparison of Student Success in Lecture and Blended Learning Introduction to Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology45(2):116–30.
MarkhamWilliam T.1991. “Research Methods in the Introductory Course: To Be or Not to Be?” Teaching Sociology19(4):464–71.
30.
McKinneyKathleen. 2007. Enhancing Learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA: Aker.
31.
McKinneyKathleen. 2018. “The Integration of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning into the Discipline of Sociology.” Teaching Sociology46(2):123–34.
32.
PainoMariaBlankenshipChastityGrauerholzLizChinJeffrey. 2012. “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Teaching Sociology: 1973–2009.” Teaching Sociology40(2):93–106.
33.
ParkerStuartTraverAmy E.CornickJonathan. 2018. “Contextualizing Developmental Math Content into Introduction to Sociology in Community College.” Teaching Sociology46(1):25–33.
34.
PerinDolores. 2011. “Facilitating Student Learning through Contextualization.” CCRC Working Paper No. 29. Community College Research Center, New York, NY.
35.
PikeDiane. 2011. “Teaching Sociology: Leader of the Pack? An Exploratory Study of Teaching Journals across Disciplines.” Teaching Sociology39(3):219–26.
36.
Rittle-JohnsonBethanySieglerRobert S.AlibaliMartha Wagner. 2001. “Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process.” Journal of Educational Psychology93(2):346–62.
37.
SchoenfeldAlan H.2000. “Purposes and Methods of Research in Mathematics Education.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society47(6):641–49.
38.
SfardAnnaCobbPaul. 2022. “Research in Mathematics Education: What Can It Teach Us about Human Learning?” Pp. 467–85 in The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by SawyerR.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
39.
SmithJohn P.diSessaAndreaRoschelleJeremy. 1993. “Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences3(2):115–63.
ArthurSteen, Lynn, ed. 1997. Why Numbers Count: Quantitative Literacy for Tomorrow’s America. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
42.
ArthurSteen, Lynn, ed. 2001. Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
43.
SteenLynn Arthur. 2004. Achieving Quantitative Literacy: An Urgent Challenge for Higher Education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
44.
StinsonDavid W.WalshawMargaret. 2017. “Exploring Different Theoretical Frontiers for Different (and Uncertain) Possibilities in Mathematics Education Research.” Pp. 128–55 in Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, edited by CaiJ.Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
45.
SwanMalcolm. 2001. “Dealing with Misconceptions in Mathematics.” Pp. 147–65 in Issues in Mathematics Teaching, edited by GatesP.London: Routledge/Falmer.
46.
SwanMalcolm. 2005. Improving Learning in Mathematics: Challenges and Strategies. Sheffield, UK: Teaching and Learning Division, Department for Education and Skills Standards Unit.
47.
SweetStephenStrandKerry. 2006. “Cultivating Quantitative Literacy: The Role of Sociology.” Teaching Sociology34(1):1–4.
48.
LukeTunstallKaraaliGizemPierceyVictor, eds. 2019. Shifting Contexts, Stable Core: Advancing Quantitative Literacy in Higher Education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
49.
WallaceDorothy. 2019. “Three Formative Questions in the Quantitative Literacy Movement.” Numeracy12(1):13. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.12.1.13.
50.
WardAnnAntoineAjaCadgeWendy. 2021. “Flipping the Classroom: Students’ Perceptions from an Introductory Sociology Course.” Learning and Teaching14(3):70–90.
51.
WarnerJaredLimVivian. 2019. “The Gini Index: A Lens for Analyzing Inequality in an Interdisciplinary College Classroom.” Numeracy12(1):5. doi:10.5038/1936-4660.12.1.5.
52.
WilderEsther Isabelle. 2009. “Responding to the Quantitative Literacy Gap among Students in Sociology Courses.” Teaching Sociology37(2):151–70.
YakuraElaine K.BennettCurtis D.2003. “Finding Common Ground: Collaboration across the Disciplines in the Scholarship of Teaching.” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching14(2/3):135–47.
55.
ZerrRyan J.2019. “Assessing Quantitative Literacy as a Cumulatively-Acquired Intellectual Skill.” Pp. 177–83 in Shifting Contexts, Stable Core, edited by TunstallL.KaraaliG.PierceyV.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
