This paper presents a foundational classroom exercise used to help introduce the systemic and interactional aspects of the binary gender system, using 12 occupations selected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and personality characteristics from the Bem Sex Role Inventory. This activity was conducted in an introductory Diversity course at a Midwestern community college over 13 semesters (n = 603). Collected results indicate a strong tendency for students to invisibly gender each occupation without any suggestive cues and a willingness in retrospect to examine their role in the implicit process of gendering. As such, this exercise may offer an additional strategy to help students understand that their individual agency can serve both to reproduce and challenge existing power relations.
AckerJoan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society4(2):139–58.
2.
AmottTeresaMatthaeiJulie. 1996. Race, Gender, and Work: A Multicultural Economic History of Women in the United States. Boston: South End Press.
3.
AndesNancy. 1992. “Social Class and Gender: An Empirical Evaluation of Occupational Stratification.” Gender & Society6(2):231–51.
4.
BandyRachel. 2007. “Bem Scale Assignment.” Assignment published in TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association (http://trails.asanet.org).
5.
BemSandra L.1974. “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology42:155–62.
6.
BergnerCariAnn Marie. 2014. “We Can Do It, but I Wouldn’t Like It: Gender, Interests, and Occupational Perceptions.” Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 13972.
7.
BohmerSusanneBriggsJoyce L.1991. “Teaching Privileged Students about Gender, Race, and Class Oppression.” Teaching Sociology19(2):154–63.
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. Traditional and Nontraditional Occupations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
9.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1999. Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by J. H. Turner. New York: Springer.
10.
ChenAnthony S.1999. “Lives at the Center of the Periphery, Lives at the Periphery of the Center: Chinese American Masculinities and Bargaining with Hegemony.” Gender & Society13(5):584–607.
11.
CurryTimothy JonClarkeAlfred C.1983. “Developing Visual Literacy: Use of Magazine Advertisements Depicting Gender Roles.” Teaching Sociology10(3):361–69.
12.
DuffyMignon. 2007. “Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective.” Gender & Society21(3):313–36.
13.
DukesRichard L.VictoriaGay. 1989. “The Effects of Gender, Status, and Effective Teaching on the Evaluation of College Instruction.” Teaching Sociology17(4):447–57.
14.
FreirePaulo. 2000. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.
15.
GiuffrePattiAndersonCynthia D.BirdSharon R.2008. “Lessons Learned at the 2007 ASA Annual Meetings: Insights from the Teaching-related Workshops.” Teaching Sociology36(1):66–78.
16.
Gómez-GilEstherGómezAngelCañizaresSilviaGuillamónAntonioRamettiGiuseppinaEstevaIsabelVázquezAlexandraSalamero-BaróManuel. 2012. “Clinical Utility of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) in the Spanish Transsexual and Non-transsexual Population.” Journal of Personality Assessment94(3):1–6.
17.
GreenblatCathy S.1973. “Teaching with Simulation Games.” Teaching Sociology1(1):62–83.
18.
GuastellaDenise D.GuastellaStephen J.2013. “The American Male and Female 35 Years Later: Bem Sex Role Inventory Revisited.” Journal of Scholastic Inquiry: Behavioral Sciences1(1):8–19.
Hesse-BiberSharlene Nagy. 1979. “Feminist Research: Exploring, Interrogating, and Transforming the Interconnections of Epistemology, Methodology, and Method.” Pp. 2–26 in Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis. 2nd ed., edited by Hesse-BiberS. Nagy. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
21.
HillCollins, Patricia. 1998. Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
HoffmanRose MarieBordersL. DiAnne. 2001. “Twenty-five Years after the Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A Reassessment and New Issues Regarding Classification Variability.” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development34:39–55.
23.
hooksbell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
24.
JohnsonBrett. 2005. “Overcoming ‘Doom and Gloom’: Empowering Students in Courses on Social Problems, Injustice, and Inequality.” Teaching Sociology33(1):44–58.
25.
KaneEmily W.2000. “Racial and Ethnic Variations in Gender-related Attitudes.” Annual Review of Sociology26:419–39.
MacNellLillianDriscollAdamHuntAndrea N.2015. “What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching.” Innovative Higher Education40(4):291–303.
31.
McCabeJanice. 2013. “Making Theory Relevant: The Gender Attitude and Belief Inventory.” Teaching Sociology 41(3):282–93.
32.
McGinnKathleen L.OhEunsil. 2017. “Gender, Social Class, and Women’s Employment.” Current Opinion in Psychology18:84–88.
33.
MessnerMichael A.2000. “Barbie Girls Versus Sea Monsters: Children Constructing Gender.” Gender & Society14(6):765–84.
34.
MillsC. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
MontoMartin A.1993. “An Exercise in Gender: The BEM Sex Role Inventory in the Classroom.” Clinical Sociology Review11(1):159–74.
37.
MurphyMichaelRibarskyElizabeth. 2013. Activities for Teaching Gender and Sexuality in the University Classroom. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
38.
NaldiniManuela. 2011. “Introduction: Feminist Views on Social Policy and Gender Equality.” Sociologica1:1–10.
39.
Nakano GlennEvelyn. 1999. “The Social Construction of and Institutionalization of Gender and Race: An Integrative Framework.” Pp. 3–43 in Revisioning Gender, edited by FerreeM. MarxLorberJ.HessB. B.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
40.
PaltrowLynn M.FlavinJeanne. 2013. “Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973–2005: Implications for Women’s Legal Status and Public Health.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law38(2):299–343.
41.
PatilVrushali. 2013. “From Patriarchy to Intersectionality: A Transnational Feminist Assessment of How Far We’ve Really Come.” Signs38(4):847–67.
42.
RidgewayCecilia L.Smith-LovinLynn. 1999. “Gender and Interaction.” Pp. 247–74 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by ChafetzJ. Saltzman. New York: Springer.
RismanBarbara J.2004. “Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism.” Gender & Society18(4):429–50.
45.
SandbergSheryl. 2013. Lean in: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. New York: Knopf.
46.
SchiltKristenWestbrookLaurel. 2009. “Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: ‘Gender Normals,’ Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality.” Gender & Society23(4):440–64.
47.
SchwalbeMichael. 2014. Manhood Acts: Gender and the Practices of Domination. London: Taylor & Francis.
48.
SobalJoffHinrichsDonald W.EmmonsCharles F.HookWade F.1981. “Experiential Learning in Introductory Sociology: A Course Description and Evaluation.” Teaching Sociology8(4):401–22.
TiemanCheryl R.Rankin-UllockBeverly. 1985. “Student Evaluations of Teachers: An Examination of the Effect of Sex and Field of Study.” Teaching Sociology12(2):177–91.
