The authors provide a brief case study of a three-strategy approach for teaching undergraduate research methods that (1) incorporates active learning assignments and discussion-based learning, (2) integrates a cross-discipline and cross-method faculty guest discussion facilitators series, and (3) focuses on the challenges and rewards of conducting research. The authors propose that opportunities for faculty teaching and research collaborations may result from the implementation of these strategies in the context of dwindling institutional resources and increasing professional demands. Finally, the authors consider how involving students in active learning projects focusing on research, and encouraging more open and honest dialogue about the challenges, struggles, and failures faculty members experience when conducting their own research, generates a reciprocal learning environment that is enriching for both students and faculty members.
American Association of University Professors. 1994. “The Work of Faculty: Expectations, Priorities, and Rewards.” Academe80(1):35-48.
2.
BakerPaul J.1986. “The Helter-Skelter Relationship between Teaching and Research: A Cluster of Problems and Small Wins.” Teaching Sociology14(1): 50-66.
3.
BraaDeanCalleroPeter. 2006. “Critical Pedagogy and Classroom Praxis.” Teaching Sociology34(4):357-69.
4.
FobesCatherineKaufmanPeter. 2008. “Critical Pedagogy in the Sociology Classroom: Challenges and Concerns.” Teaching Sociology36(1):26-33.
5.
FreyJerry D.NowaczykRonald H.1982. “Combining Research Interests with the Teaching of Undergraduates: A Report on a Team-taught Seminar.” Teaching of Psychology9(4):220-21.
MacheskiGinger E.LowneyKathleen S.BuhrmannJanBushMelanie E.L.2008. “Overcoming Student Disengagement and Anxiety in Theory, Methods, and Statistics Courses by Building a Community of Learners.” Teaching Sociology36(1):42-48.
8.
ManningKarenZacharPeterRayGlen E.LoBelloSteven. 2006. “Research Methods Courses and the Scientist and Practitioner Interests of Psychology Majors.” Teaching of Psychology33(3):194-96.
9.
McKinneyKathleenHoweryCarla B.StrandKerry J.KainEdward L.BerheideCatherine White. 2004. Liberal Learning and the Sociology Major Updated: Meeting the Challenge of Teaching Sociology in the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
RogalinChristabel L.PfefferCarla A.2012. “Masculinity as a Collective Social Accomplishment.” Paper accepted for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August 17-20, Denver, CO.
14.
SchuttRussell K.BlalockHubert M.Jr.WagenaarTheodore C.1984. “Goals and Means for Research Methods Courses.” Teaching Sociology11(3):235-58.
15.
SearleAnn. 1999. Introducing Research and Data in Psychology: A Guide to Methods and Analysis. New York: Routledge.
16.
ShostakSaraGirouardJenniferCunninghamDavidCadgeWendy. 2010. “Teaching Graduate and Undergraduate Research Methods: A Multipronged Departmental Initiative.” Teaching Sociology38(2):93-105.
17.
SizemoreO. J.LewandowskiGary W.Jr.2009. “Learning Might Not Equal Liking: Research Methods Course Changes Knowledge but Not Attitudes.” Teaching Psychology36(2):90-95.
18.
SobalJeffHinrichsDonald W.EmmonsCharles F.HookWade F.1981. “Experiential Learning in Introductory Sociology: A Course Description and Evaluation.” Teaching Sociology8(4):401-22.
19.
StalpMarybeth C.GrantLinda2001. “Teaching Qualitative Coding in Undergraduate Field Method Classes: An Exercise Based on Personal Ads.” Teaching Sociology29(2):209-18.
20.
TakataSusan R.LeitingWanda. 1987. “Learning by Doing: The Teaching of Sociological Research Methods.” Teaching Sociology15(2):144-50.
21.
TanJooEanKoYiu-Chung. 2004. “Using Feature Films to Teach Observation in Undergraduate Research Methods.” Teaching Sociology32(1):109-18.
22.
TaylorRalph B.McConnellPatrick. 2001. “BAC and Beer: Operationalizing Drunk Driving Laws in a Research Methods Course Exercise.” Teaching Sociology29(2):219-28.
WrightMary C.HoweryCarla B.AssarNandiniMcKinneyKathleenKainEdward L.GlassBeckyKramerLauraAtkinsonMaxine. 2004. “Greedy Institutions: The Importance of Institutional Context for Teaching in Higher Education.” Teaching Sociology32(2):144-59.
