AlkemaGretchen E.AlleyDawn E.2006. “Gerontology’s Future: An Integrative Model for Disciplinary Advancement.” The Gerontologist46(5):574-82.
2.
BengstonVern L.RiceCara J.JohnsonMalcolm L.1999. “Are Theories of Aging Important? Models and Explanations in Gerontology at the Turn of the Century.” Pp. 3-20 in Handbook of Theories of Aging, edited by BengstonV. L.SchaieK. W.New York: Springer.
3.
CarrDawnWellinChrisReeceHeather. 2009. “A Review of Arts and Aging Research: Revealing an Elusive but Promising Direction for the Era of the Third Age.” Journal of Aging, Humanities, and the Arts3(2):199-221.
4.
CorsaroWilliam A.1997. The Sociology of Childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
5.
DanneferDale. 2003. “Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory.” Journal of Gerontology: SOCIAL SCIENCES58B(6):S327-37.
6.
EderDonna. 1993. School Talk. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
7.
EstesCarroll L.1979. The Aging Enterprise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
FettesDanielleGongFangOlafsdottirSigrunPavalkoEliza, eds. 2002. The Life Course: A Handbook of Syllabi & Instructional Materials. 3rd ed.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
9.
FineGary Alan. 1987. With the Boys. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
HarrisDiana K., ed. 2000. Teaching Sociology of Aging and the Life Course. 5th ed.Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
11.
HeinzWalter R.2003. “From Work Trajectories to Negotiated Careers: The Contingent Work Life Course.” Pp. 185-204 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by MortimerJ. T.ShanahanM. J.New York: Springer.
12.
KaufmanSharon R.1986. The Ageless Self. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
13.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
MacLeodJay. [1987] 1995. Ain’t No Makin’ It. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15.
McAdamsDan P.1993. Stories We Live by. New York: William Morrow and Company.
16.
McKinneyKathleen. 2005. “Sociology Senior Majors’ Perceptions on Learning Sociology: A Research Note.” Teaching Sociology33(4):371-79.
17.
PriestleyMark. 2003. Disability: A Life Course Approach. Malden, MA: Polity.
18.
RileyMatilda White. 1988. “On the Significance of Age in Sociology.” Pp. 24-45 in Social Structures & Human Lives, edited by RileyM. W.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
SetterstenRichard A.Jr.FurstenbergFrank F.Jr.RumbautRuben, eds. 2005. On the Frontier of Adulthood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
SpectorMalcolmKitsuseJohn I.1987. Constructing Social Problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
SternsHarvey L.FerraroKenneth F.2009. “The Evolution of Gerontology Education over Three Decades: Reflections and Prospects.” Pp. 3-12 in Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. Vol. 28, edited by SternsH. L.BernardM. A.New York: Springer.
22.
StollerEleanor P.GibsonRose C., eds. 2000. Worlds of Difference. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
23.
StreibGordon F.1981. “Aging Comes of Age.” Contemporary Sociology10(2):186-90.
24.
TaubDiane E.FanflikPatricia L.2000. “The Inclusion of Disability in Introductory Sociology Textbooks.” Teaching Sociology28(1):12-23.
25.
WellinChris. 2007. “Narrative Interviewing: Process and Benefits in Teaching about Aging and the Life Course.” Gerontology & Geriatrics Education28(1):79-99.