Though C. Wright Mills made a pivotal contribution to the discipline by raising sociologists' awareness of the ideological and bureaucratic content of sociological practicality, he may have placed unyielding limits on “the promise” he profoundly proclaimed in the “sociological imagination.” By defining types of practicality in such rigidly confining terms, as either “liberal” or “illiberal,” those wishing to practice sociology in broader and more expansive ways were left with few of the alternatives Mills himself wished to extol. Over the past generation, the field of applied sociology and teaching and learning sociological practice have struggled to develop in the discipline. This has posed huge challenges for teachers wishing to address the needs of students who have perennially been interested in finding practical possibilities for applying their sociology in jobs and careers. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) examine the concept of sociological practicality propounded by Mills; 2) critically assess the concept of sociological practicality in the historical context of American sociology; 3) identify and discuss a broad typology of models of research and practice from which types of practicality may emerge; 4) discuss the implications of this typology for teaching and learning sociological practice; and 5) conclude by discussing ways of teaching a liberating practicality for sociology.
BravermanHarry1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital.New York: Monthly Review Press.
3.
BurawoyMichael2005. “For Public Sociology.” American Sociological Review70(1):4–28.
4.
BurrellGibsonMorganGareth1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life.London, England: Heinemann.
5.
CappelCharlesKamensDavid2002. “Curriculum Assessment: A Case Study in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology30(4):467–94.
6.
ChinJeffrey2002. “Is There a Sociology of Teaching and Learning in Teaching Sociology? A Look a Papers from 1984”–1999.” Teaching Sociology30(1):53–62.
7.
ChinJeffrey2006. “Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Collection and Assessment of Data” Teaching/Matters34(3):2–4.
8.
ClaytonO.Jr.1995. An American Dilemma Revisited: Race Relations in a Changing World.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
HandCarl M.2007. “The Practice of Sociology: Teaching Theory with an Applied Perspective.” Journal of Applied Social Science1(1):25–33.
20.
HawdonJamesMobleyCatherine2001. “Applied Sociology: What Skills Are Important.” Social Insight6:12–20.
21.
Hironimus-WendtRobert J.Lovell-TroyLarry, 1999. “Grounding Service Learning and Social Theory.” Teaching Sociology27(4):360–72.
22.
KanterRosa Beth Moss1979. Men and Women of the Corporation.New York: Basic Books.
23.
KanterRosa Beth Moss1983. The Change Masters: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the American Corporation.New York: Simon & Shuster.
24.
KeithBruceEnderMorten G.2004. “The Sociological Core: Conceptual Patterns and Idiosyncrasies in the Structure and Content of Introductory Textbooks, 1940”–2000.” Teaching Sociology32(1):19–36.
25.
KeithBruceEnderMorten G.2004. “Core, What Core? Looking Beyond the Introductory Textbook for Answers.” Teaching Sociology32(1):39–40.
26.
McKinneyKathleen2004. “Using SOTL in Sociology: Evidence from Two Volumes of TS.” Teaching/Matters33(2):3–4.
27.
McKinneyKathleenMedvedevaMaria A.VaccaKareyMalakJanice2004. “Beyond the Classroom: An Exploratory Study of Out-of-Class Learning in Sociology.” Teaching Sociology32(1):43–60.
28.
MillsC. Wright1959. The Sociological Imagination.New York: Oxford University.
29.
MobleyCatherine2007. “Breaking Ground: Engaging Undergraduates in Social Change Through Service Learning.” Teaching Sociology35(2):125–37.
30.
MorganGareth, ed. 1983. Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
ParillaPeterHesserGary W.1998. “Internships and the Sociological Perspective: Applying Principles of Experiential Learning.” Teaching Sociology26(4):310–29.
32.
PerrowCharles1986. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay.New York: McGraw-Hill.
SteeleStephen F.IutcovichJoyce, eds. 1997. Directions in Applied Sociology: Presidential Addresses of the Society for Applied Sociology 1985”–1995.Arnold, MD: Society for Applied Sociology.
41.
StoeckerRandy2005. Research Methods for Community Change: A Project Based Approach.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
WeissGregory L.2002. “The Current Status of Assessment in Sociology Departments.” Teaching Sociology30(4):391–402.
50.
WhyteWilliam F.1984. Learning From the Field: Reflections on a Career.Walnut Creek, CA: Sage.
51.
WhyteWilliam F.1987. “From Human Relations to Organizational Behavior: Reflections on the Changing Scene.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review40(4): 484–500.
52.
WhyteWilliam F.1991. Participatory Action Research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53.
WilsonWilliam Julius1996. When Work Disappears.New York: Knof.
54.
WirthLouis1931. “Sociology and Clinical Procedure.” American Journal of Sociology37(1):49–66.
