How is sociological research practice learned? Because much of the tacit knowledge required to succeed in professions such as academia cannot be obtained formally, informal channels of learning—such as interaction with advisors—may be crucial. In this paper I test the extent to which graduate school advisors influence the development of their advisees' research habits, practices, and beliefs. I find that advisors' attitudes and intra-professional standing affect how their advisees view various research practices—both those that are less codified (such as how to deal with anomalous data) and those that are quite standardized (such as statistical significance testing). For the least standardized and most qualitative research practices, such as interpreting qualitative text, I find that students' experiences are more relevant that advisors' attitudes. I discuss these findings by referencing literature in the sociology of science and knowledge and relate my findings to broader knowledge about teaching sociology at the graduate level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottAndrew1981.
“Status and Status Strain in the Professions.”
American Journal of Sociology86:
819–35.
2.
American Sociological Association.2000.
Guide to Graduate Departments.
Washington DC:
American Sociological Association.
3.
BargarRobert R.Mayo-ChamberlainJane1983.
“Advisor and Advisee Issues in Doctoral Education.”
Journal of Higher Education54:
407–32.
4.
BeckerHoward S.1998.
Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You're Doing It.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
5.
BidwellCharles E.YasumotoJeffrey. Y.,
1999.
“The Collegial Focus: Teaching Fields, Collegial Relationships, and Instructional Practice in American High Schools.”
Sociology of Education72:
234–56.
6.
BraxtonJohn M.1991.
“The Influence of Graduate Department Quality on the Sanctioning of Scientific Misconduct.”
Journal of Higher Education62:
87–108.
7.
BurtRonald S.1982.
Toward A Structural Theory of Action.
New York:
Academic Press.
8.
CarliLinda L.1991.
“Gender, Status, and Influence.”
Pp. 89–113 in
Advances in Group Processes,
vol. 8,
edited by LawlerE.J.ThyeS.R.Oxford, UK:
Elsevier Science.
9.
CasperMonica J.ClarkeAdele E.1998.
“Making the Pap Smear into the ‘Right Tool’ for the Job: Cervical Cancer Screening in the USA, circa 1940–95.”
Social Studies of Science28:
255–90.
10.
CawyerCarol StringerSimondsCheriDavisShannon2002.
“Mentoring to Facilitate Socialization: The Case of the New Faculty Member.”
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education15:
224–42.
11.
ConkMargo A.1981.
“Accuracy, Efficiency, and Bias: The Interpretation of Women's Work in the U.S. Census of Occupations, 1890–1940.”
Historical Methods14:
65–72.
12.
CowgerCharles D.1984.
“Statistical Significance Tests: Scientific Ritualism or Scientific Method?”
Social Service Review58:
358–71.
13.
CraneDiana1972.
Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
14.
DelamontSaraAtkinsonPaul2001.
“Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge.”
Social Studies of Science31:
87–107.
15.
DewaldWilliam G.ThursbyJerry G.AndersonRichard G.1986.
“Replication in Empirical Economics: The Journal of Money, Credit and Banking Project.”
American Economic Review76:
587–603.
16.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983.
“The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”
American Sociological Review48:
147–60.
17.
DornDean S.1991.
“Special Issue on Graduate Education.”
Teaching Sociology19
(3).
18.
DreebenRobert2003.
Sociology of Education Bibiolgraphy.
Available on the American Sociological Association website (http://www2.asanet.org/soe/).
19.
EdgarDonald E.WarrenRichard L.1969.
“Power and Autonomy in Teacher Socialization.”
Sociology of Education42:
386–99.
20.
EganJanet Malenchek1989.
“Graduate School and the Self: A Theoretical View of Some Negative Effects of Professional Socialization.”
Teaching Sociology17:
200–8.
21.
EnsherEllenMurphySusan E.1997.
“Effects of Race, Gender, Perceived Similarity, and Contact on Mentor Relationships.”
Journal of Vocational Behavior50:
460–81.
22.
EricksonBonnie H.1988.
“The Relational Basis of Attitudes.”
Pp. 99–122 in
Social Structures: A Network Approach,
edited by WellmanBarryBerkowitzS.D.Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
23.
FirebaughGlenn1980.
“The Case of the Missing Values Card and Other Mysteries.”
American Sociological Review45:
137–46.
24.
FolseKimberly A.1991.
“Ethics and the Profession: Graduate Student Training.”
Teaching Sociology19:
344–50.
25.
GarnerCatherine L.RaudenbushStephen W.1991.
“Neighborhood Effects on Educational Attainment: A Multilevel Analysis.”
Sociology of Education64:
251–62.
26.
GlaserBarney G.1963.
“Attraction, Autonomy, and Reciprocity in the Scientist-Supervisor Relationship.”
Administrative Science Quarterly8:
379–98.
27.
GlassJenniferBengtsonVern L.DunhamCharlotte Chorn1986.
“Attitude Similarity in Three-Generation Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance, or Reciprocal Influence?”
American Sociological Review51:
685–98.
28.
GlennNorval D.1991.
“Some Troublesome Trends and Persisting Weaknesses in Sociology Graduate Education.”
Teaching Sociology19:
445–6.
29.
GoldbergerMarvin L.MaherBrendan A.FlattauPamela Ebert, eds.
1995.
Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change.
Washington DC:
The National Academies Press.
30.
GonzalezCristina2001.
“Undergraduate Research, Graduate Mentoring, and the University's Mission.”
Science293:
1624–6.
31.
GouldStephen Jay1981.
The Mismeasure of Man.
New York:
W.W. Norton.
32.
GustonDavid H.1993.
“Mentorship and the Research Training Experience.”
Pp. 50–65 in
Responsible Science,
vol. II,
edited by National Academy of Sciences.
Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
33.
HallinanMaureen T.WilliamsRichard A.1990.
“Students' Characteristics and the Peer-Influence Process.”
Sociology of Education63:
122–32.
34.
HeinrichKathleen T.1995.
“Doctoral Advisement Relationships between Women.”
Journal of Higher Education66:
447–69.
35.
HoraiJoann1974.
“The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness upon Opinion Agreement and Liking.”
Sociometry37:
601–6.
36.
HuberP. J.1967.
“The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-Standard Conditions.”
Pp. 221–33 in
Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability,
edited by CamL. M. LeNeymanJ.Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
37.
JassoGuillermina1985.
“Marital Coital Frequency and the Passage of Time: Estimating the Separate Effects of Spouses' Ages and Marital Duration, Birth and Marriage Cohorts, and Period Influences.”
American Sociological Review50:
224–41.
38.
JenkinsPatricia H.1995.
“School Delinquency and School Commitment.”
Sociology of Education68:
221–39.
39.
KahnJoanUdryJ. Richard1986.
“Marital Coital Frequency: Unnoticed Outliers and Unspecified Interactions Lead to Erroneous Conclusions.”
American Sociological Review51:
734–7.
40.
KandelDenise B.1978.
“Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships.”
American Journal of Sociology84:
427–36.
41.
KeithBruceMooreHelen A.1995.
“Training Sociologists: An Assessment of Professional Socialization and the Emergence of Career Aspirations.”
Teaching Sociology23:
199–214.
42.
Knorr-CetinaKarin1995.
“How Superorganisms Change: Consensus Formation and the Social Ontology of High-Energy Physics.”
Social Studies of Science25:
119–47.
43.
Knorr-CetinaKarin1999.
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
44.
LacyWilliam B.1978.
“Interpersonal Relationships as Mediators of Structural Effects.”
Sociology of Education51:
201–11.
45.
LareauAnnette1987.
“Social Class Differences in Family-School Relationships: The Importance of Cultural Capital.”
Sociology of Education60:
73–85.
46.
LatourBruno1980.
“Is it Possible to Reconstruct the Research Process? Sociology of a Brain Peptide.”
Pp. 53–73 in
The Social Process of Scientific Investigation,
edited by CetinaKaren KnorrKrohnR.WhitleyR. P.London, England:
D. Reidel.
47.
LavinDanielleMaynardDouglas W.2001.
“Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent Laughter and Interviewer Reaction during Telephone Surveys.”
American Sociological Review66:
453–79.
48.
LeaheyErin2004.
“The Role of Status in Evaluating Research Practice.”
Social Science Research33:
521–37.
49.
LeaheyErin2005.
“Alphas and Asterisks: The Development of Statistical Significance Testing Standards in Sociology.”
Social Forces81:
1–24.
50.
LeaheyErinEntwisleBarbaraEinaudiPeter2003.
“Diversity in Everyday Research Practice: The Case of Data Editing.”
Sociological Methods and Research32:
64–89.
51.
LeiterJeffrey1981.
“Perceived Teacher Autonomy and the Meaning of Organizational Control.”
The Sociological Quarterly22:
225–39.
52.
LiebersonStanleyLynnFreda B.2002.
“Barking up the Wrong Branch: Scientific Alternatives to the Current Model of Sociological Science.”
Annual Review of Sociology28:
1–19.
53.
LovittsBarbara2001.
Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield.
54.
MaHing KeungShekDaniel T. L.CheungPing ChungTamKa Keung2002.
“A Longitudinal Study of Peer and Teacher Influences on Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior of Hong Kong Chinese Adolescents.”
Social Behavior and Personality30:
157–68.
55.
MacrinaFrancis L.2000.
Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases.
Washington, DC:
ASM Press.
56.
MarchJames G.1955.
“An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence.”
American Political Science Review49:
431–51.
57.
MaynardDouglas W.SchaefferNora Cate2002.
“Standardization and Its Discontents.”
Pp. 3–46 in
Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview,
edited by MaynardDouglas W.Houtkoop-SteenstraHannekeSchaefferNora Catevan der ZouwenJohannesNew York:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
58.
MertonRobert K.1968.
Social Theory and Social Structure.
New York:
Free Press.
59.
MolmLinda1981.
“Power Use in the Dyad: The Effects of Structure, Knowledge, and Interaction History.”
Social Psychology Quarterly44:
42–8.
60.
MorrisonDentonHenkelRamon, eds.
1970.
The Significance Test Controversy.
Chicago, IL:
Aldine Publishing Company.
61.
NachmiasChava FrankfortNachmiasDavid1992.
Research Methods in the Social Sciences.
New York:
St. Martin's Press.
62.
ParsonsTalcott1951.
The Social System.
Glencoe, IL:
The Free Press.
63.
ParsonsTalcott1963.
“On The Concept of Influence.”
Public Opinion Quarterly27:
37–62.
64.
PescosolidoBernice A.1991.
“The Sociology of the Professions and the Profession of Sociology: Professional Responsibility, Teaching, and Graduate Training.”
Teaching Sociology19:
351–61.
65.
PetersonRichard1996.
“A Re-evaluation of the Economic Consequences of Divorce.”
American Sociological Review61:
528–36.
66.
RafteryAdrian E.1995.
“Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.”
Sociological Methodology25:
111–63.
67.
RosenBernard C.BatesAlan P.1967.
“The Structure of Socialization in Graduate School.”
Sociological Inquiry37:
71–84.
68.
RosierKatherine Brown2001.
“‘Without the Parent You Lose the Child’: Teachers' Expectations and Parents' (Non-)Involvement.”
Sociological Studies of Children and Youth8:
3–42.
69.
ShulmanDavidSilverIra2003.
“The Business of Becoming a Professional Sociologist: Unpacking the Informal Training of Graduate School.”
The American Sociologist34:
56–72.
70.
SosikJohn J.GodshalkVeronica M.2000.
“The Role of Gender in Mentoring.”
Journal of Vocational Behavior57:
102–22.
71.
StruthersNancy J.1995.
“Differences in Mentoring: A Function of Gender or Organizational Rank?”
Journal of Social Behavior and Personality10:
265–72.
72.
Sui-ChuEsther HoWilliamsJ. Douglas1996.
“Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement.”
Sociology of Education69:
126–41.
73.
SullivanTeresa A.1991.
“Making the Graduate Curriculum Explicit.”
Teaching Sociology19:
408–13.
74.
TimmermansStefanBergMarc1997.
“Standardization in Action: Achieving Local Universality through Medical Protocols.”
Social Studies of Science27:
273–305.
75.
TrocchiaPhilip J.BerkowitzDavid1999.
“Getting Doctored: A Proposed Model of Marketing Doctoral Student Socialization.”
European Journal of Marketing33:
746–59.
76.
U.S. Census Bureau,2002.
Statistical Abstracts of the United States.
Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office.
77.
VictorBartCullenJohn B.1988.
“The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates.”
Administrative Science Quarterly33:
101–25.
78.
ViternaJocelyn S.MaynardDouglas W.2002.
“How Uniform is Standardization? Variation Within and Across Survey Research Centers Regarding Protocols for Interviewing.”
Pp. 365–98 in
Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview,
edited by MaynardDouglas W.Houtkoop-SteenstraHannekeSchaefferNora Catevan der ZouwenJohannesNew York:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
79.
WeitzmanLenore J.1985.
The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America.
New York:
Free Press.
80.
WhiteHalbert1980.
“A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.”
Econometrica48:
817–38.
81.
WitmerDiane F.ColmanRobert W.KatzmanSandra Lee1999.
“From Paper-and-Pencil to Screen-and-Keyboard: Toward a Methodology for Survey Research on the Internet.”
Pp. 145–61 in
Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net,
edited by JonesSteveThousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications.
