AbelsonRobert P.1995.
Statistics as Principled Argument.
Hillside, NJ:
Erlbaum.
2.
AusterCarol J.2000.
“Probability Sampling and Inferential Statistics: An Interactive Exercise Using M&M's.”
Teaching Sociology28:
379–85.
3.
BessantKenneth C.1992.
“Instructional Design and the Development of Statistical Literacy.”
Teaching Sociology20:
143–9.
4.
BlalockHubert M.Jr.1989.
“The Real and Unrealized Contributions of Quantitative Sociology.”
American Sociological Review54:
447–60.
5.
CobbGeorge W.1993.
“Reconsidering Statistics Education: A National Science Foundation Conference.”
Journal of Statistics Education
1.
Retrieved December 3, 2004 (www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/cobb.html).
6.
CohenJacob1990.
“Things I Have Learned (So Far).”
American Psychologist45:
1304–12.
7.
CohenJacob1994.
“The Earth is Round (p<.05)”
American Psychologist49:
997–1003.
8.
DatsonLorraine1988.
Classical Probability in the Enlightenment.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
9.
FalkRumaGreenbaumCharles W.1995.
“Significance Tests Die Hard: The Amazing Persistence of a Probabilistic Misconception.”
Theory and Psychology5:
75–98.
10.
FischerHenry W.III.1996.
“Teaching Statistics From the User's Perspective.”
Teaching Sociology24:
225–30.
11.
FisherRonald A.1925.
Statistical Methods for Research Workers.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
Oliver and Boyd.
12.
FisherRonald A.1935.
The Design of Experiments.
Edinburgh, Scotland:
Oliver and Boyd.
13.
FuchsStephen1992.
The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge.
Albany, NY:
SUNY Press.
14.
GigerenzerGerd1987.
“Probabilistic Thinking and the Fight Against Subjectivity.”
Pp. 11–33 in
The Probabilistic Revolution,
vol. 2,
Ideas in the Sciences,
edited by KrügerLorenzGigerenzerGerdMorganMary S.Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
15.
GigerenzerGerdMurrayDavid J.1987.
Cognition as Intuitive Statistics.
Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
16.
HoggRobert V.1991.
“Statistical Education: Improvements Are Badly Needed.”
The American Statistician45:
342–3.
17.
LatourBrunoWoolgarSteve1986.
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Knowledge.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
18.
LongmoreMonica A.DunnDanaJarboeGlen R.1996.
“Learning by Doing: Group Projects in Research Methods Classes.”
Teaching Sociology24:
84–91.
19.
MorrisonDenton E.HenkelRamon E., eds.
1970.
The Significance Test Controversy-A Reader.
Chicago, IL:
Aldine.
20.
OakesMichael1986.
Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Chichester, England:
Wiley.
21.
PorterTheodore M.1986.
The Rise of Statistical Thinking.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
22.
PorterTheodore M.1990.
“The Quantification of Uncertainty After 1700: Statistics Socially Constructed?”
Pps. 45–75 in
Acting Under Uncertainty: Multidisciplinary Concepts,
edited by Von FurstenbergGeorge M.Boston, MA:
Kluwer Academic.
23.
PotterAlisa M.1995.
“Statistics for Sociologists: Teaching Techniques that Work.”
Teaching Sociology23:
259–63.
24.
RushingBethWinfieldIdee1999.
“Learning About Sampling and Measurement by Doing Content Analysis of Personal Advertisements.”
Teaching Sociology27:
159–66.
25.
SchachtStevenStewartBrad1992.
“Interactive/User-Friendly Gimmicks for Teaching Statistics.”
Teaching Sociology20:
329–33.
26.
SelvinHanan C.1957.
“A Critique of Tests of Significance in Survey Research.”
American Sociological Review22:
519–27.
27.
SneeRonald D.1993.
“What's Missing in Statistical Education?”
The American Statistician47:
149–54.
28.
StiglerStephen M.1986.
The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty Before 1900.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
29.
StiglerStephen M.1999.
Statistics on the Table: The History of Statistical Concepts and Methods.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
30.
TukeyJohn W.1977.
Exploratory Data Analysis.
Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley.
31.
WattsDonald G.1991.
“Why is Introductory Statistics Difficult to Learn? And What Can We Do to Make it Easier?”
American Statistician45:
290–1.
32.
WybraniecJohnWilmothJanet1999.
“Teaching Students Inferential Statistics: A ‘Tail’ of Three Distributions.”
Teaching Sociology27:
74–80.
33.
ZiliakStephen T.McCloskeyDeirdre N.2004.
“Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economic Review.”
Economic Journal Watch1:
334–58.
