The importance of preparing students for citizenship in a global society is well recognized in teaching sociology. Although options have emerged to facilitate such pedagogical experiences, few concentrate on maximizing students' experiences in non-English-speaking nations. How can we help sociology students get the most out of an experience in a foreign language society if they do not speak the language? I propose a critical pedagogical approach to travel-study abroad by presenting a case study of a unique three-week intensive class taught in Cusco, Peru. Following Kaufman's (2002) four-point model of critical pedagogy, I recommend that understanding, reflecting, analyzing, and engaging in social action can help structure the application of critical pedagogy to travel-study abroad in sociology. My research suggests benefits of such an approach, including working with a native educational institution, pairing sociology and Spanish students, and using home-stay families as informal teachers. I conclude by offering suggestions for faculty interested in creating a travel-study abroad course, to a developing nation in particular.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlondetCecilia1995.
“Out of the Kitchens and Onto the Streets: Women's Activism in Peru.”
Pp. 251–75 in
The Challenge of Local Feminisms: Women's Movements in Global Perspective,
edited by BasuAmrita with the assistance of C. Elizabeth McGrory.
Boulder, CO:
Westview.
2.
CameronJeanneWalshPhilipStavenhagen-HelgrenTinaKobritzBarbara2002.
“Assessment as Critical Praxis: A Community College Experience.”
Teaching Sociology30:
414–29.
3.
ChowEsther Ngan-lingFanGang-HuaFleckChadwickJosephJoshuaLyterDeanna M.2003.
“Exploring Critical Feminist Pedagogy: Infusing Dialogue, Participation, And Experience in Teaching and Learning.”
Teaching Sociology31:
259–75.
4.
DalaimoDenise2002.
“Democracy and Critical Thinking in the Cross-Cultural.”
Pp. 81–104 in
Critical Pedagogy in the Sociology Classroom,
edited by KaufmanPeterWashington, DC:
American Sociological Association.
5.
DresselPaula1990.
“Films That Put Social Problems in Global Context.”
Teaching Sociology18:
226–30.
6.
EmersonRobert M., ed.
2001a.
Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations.
Prospect Heights, IL:
Waveland.
7.
EmersonRobert M., ed.
2001b.
“Fieldwork Practice: Issues in Participant Observation.”
Pp. 113–51 in
Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations,
edited by EmersonRobert M.Prospect Heights, IL:
Waveland.
8.
ForsterBrendaPrinzAndrew K.1988.
“Travel-Study as Learning in Sociology.”
Teaching Sociology16:
67–73.
9.
FrierePaulo1970.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed.
New York:
Continuum.
10.
FrierePaulo1998.
Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield.
11.
FullerNorma2001.
“The Social Constitution of Gender Identity among Peruvian Men.”
Men and Masculinities3:
316–31.
12.
GannonMartin J.PoonJune M. L.1997.
“Effect of Alternative Instructional Approaches on Cross-Cultural Training Outcomes.”
International Journal Intercultural Relations21:
429–46.
13.
GirouxHenryMcLarenPeter, eds.
1989.
Critical Pedagogy, The State, and Cultural Struggle.
Albany, NY:
State University of New York Press.
14.
GoffmanErving [1989]
2001.
“On Fieldwork.”
Pp. 153–8 in
Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations,
edited by EmersonRobert M.Prospect Heights, IL:
Waveland.
15.
GrantLindaHeirichMaxMartinSteven S.EckEllen Van1981.
“The Detroit Tours: Experiential Learning Within the Framework of a Large Lecture Course.”
Teaching Sociology9:
15–29.
HalseyJohn1990.
“Teaching Sociology in an Overseas Program: The Uses of Marginality.”
Teaching Sociology18:
203–8.
18.
HareSara C.1999.
“Using E-Mail to Promote Cross-Cultural Understanding of Families.”
Teaching Sociology27:
67–73.
19.
HarrodWendy J.1996.
“Teaching About Antisemitism.”
Teaching Sociology24:
195–201.
20.
HiteKatherine, ed.
1997.
The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation.
London, England:
Oxford University Press.
21.
hooksbell1994.
Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom.
New York:
Routledge.
22.
JobesPatrick C.AldeaAndraCernatConstantinIcolisanIoana-MinervaIordacheGarielLazeruSabastianStoicaCatalinTibilGheorgheUdangiuEugenia1997.
“Using the Constant Comparative Method in the Foreign Classroom: Shopping as a Social Problem in Romania.”
Teaching Sociology25:
292–302.
23.
KainEdward L.D'AndreaVaneeta-Marie1992.
“Teaching Sociology in an International Setting: Using London as Laboratory.”
Teaching Sociology20:
1–11.
24.
KaufmanPeter2001.
“All the News Not Fit to Print: Using Censored Stories as an Exercise in Critical Pedagogy.”
Teaching Sociology29:
80–7.
25.
KaufmanPeter, ed.
2002.
Critical Pedagogy in the Sociology Classroom.
Washington, DC:
American Sociological Association.
26.
LessorRobertaReevesMargaretAndradeEnrique1997.
“Interdisciplinary Team-Teaching on Sustainable Development in Costa Rica.”
Teaching Sociology19:
134–49.
27.
LittlePatriciaMarxMarcia2002.
“Teaching About Homophobia and Heterosexism.”
Pp. 117–22 in
Critical Pedagogy in the Sociology Classroom,
edited by KaufmanPeterWashington, DC:
American Sociological Association.
28.
LorberJudith [1994]
1997.
“The Social Construction of Gender.”
Pp. 83–90 in
Race, Class, and Gender in a Diverse Society,
edited by KendallDianaBoston, MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
29.
MartinPatricia Yancey2002.
“Glossary of Gender Concepts.”
Florida State University. Unpublished glossary.
30.
McLarenPeter2000.
Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the Pedagogy of Revolution.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield.
31.
McLarenPeter2002.
“Critical Theory and the Politics of Pedagogy.”
Pp. 2–21 in
Critical Pedagogy in the Sociology Classroom,
edited by KaufmanPeterWashington, DC:
American Sociological Association.
32.
PescosolidoBerniceAminzadeRonald, eds.
1999.
The Social Worlds of Higher Education: Handbook for Teaching in a New Century.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Pine Forge.
33.
Rezai-RashtiGoli1995.
“Multicultural Education, Anti-Racist Education, and Critical Pedagogy: Reflections on Everyday Practice.”
Pp. 3–19 in
Anti-Racism, Feminism and Critical Approaches to Education,
edited by NgRoxanaStatonPatScaneJoyceWestport, CT:
Bergin and Garvey.
34.
SchmidThomas J.BuechlerSteven M.1991.
“Crossing Boundaries: Sociology in the Wilderness.”
Teaching Sociology19:
34–41.
United Nations.2004.
“United Nations Statistics Division.”
United Nations.
Retrieved August 1, 2004 (http://unstats.un.org/unsd).
37.
WagenaarTheodore C.SubediJanardan1996.
“Internationalizing the Curriculum: Study in Nepal.”
Teaching Sociology24:
272–83.
38.
WarrenCarol A. B.2001.
“Gender and Field-work Relations.”
Pp. 203–23 in
Contemporary Field Research: Perspective and Formulations,
edited by EmersonRobert M.Prospect Heights, IL:
Waveland.
39.
WestSarahFenstermakerCandace1995.
“Doing Difference.”
Gender and Society9:
8–37.
