Although the literature on social networks has made a considerable contribution to the sociological imagination in recent years, it has been largely ignored in conventional course materials. Such an omission is curious, considering social networks' intuitive imagery, broad theoretical relevance and extensive empirical application. This article offers a remedy to that oversight, describing a challenging yet accessible curriculum including readings, classroom exercises, and student-centered learning projects.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BellDavid C.AtkinsonJohn S.CarlsonJerry W.1999.
“Centrality Measures for Disease Transmission Networks.”
Social Networks21:
1–21.
2.
BernardH. RussellKillworthPeter D.JohnsenEugene C.ShelleyGene A.McCartyChristopher2001.
“Estimating the Ripple Effect of a Disaster.”
Connections24:
30–4.
3.
BlauPeter M.1977.
Inequality and Heterogeneity.
New York:
Free Press.
4.
BreigerRonald1974.
“The Duality of Persons and Groups.”
Social Forces53:
181–90.
5.
CanterDavidAlisonLaurence1999.
The Social Psychology of Crime: Groups, Teams and Networks.
Aldershot:
Ashgate Publishing.
6.
CarleyKathleen1991.
“A Theory of Group Stability.”
American Sociological Review56:
331–54.
7.
DurkheimEmile1982.
“What is a Social Fact?”
Pp. 50–9 in
The Rules of Sociological Method,
edited by LukesStevenNew York:
The Free Press.
8.
EmersonRichard M.1962.
“Power-Dependence Relations.”
American Sociological Review27:
31–40.
9.
FeldScott L.1981.
“The Focused Organization of Social Ties.”
American Journal of Sociology86:
1015–35.
10.
FischerClaude1982.
To Dwell Among Friends.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
11.
FrankOve2001.
“Statistical Estimation of Co-Offending Youth Networks.”
Social Networks23:
203–14.
12.
GiuffreKatherinePaxtonPamela1997.
“Building Social Networks.”
Teaching Sociology25:
207–13.
13.
GouldRoger V.1991.
“Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871.”
American Sociological Review56:
716–29.
14.
GranovetterMark1973.
“The Strength of Weak Ties.”
American Journal of Sociology78:
1360–80.
15.
Institute for Scientific Information.2005.
Journal Citation Reports.
Retrieved February 25, 2005 (http://isi2.isiknowledge.com).
16.
KnokeDavid1990.
Political Networks: The Structural Perspective.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
17.
KornblumWilliamSmithCarolyn D.1999.
Sociology in a Changing World.
5th ed.Albany, NY:
International Thomson Publishing.
18.
KornhauserWilliam1959.
The Politics of Mass Society.
New York:
The Free Press.
19.
LinNan2001.
Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
20.
LouchHugh2000.
“Personal Network Integration: Transitivity and Homophily in Strong-Tie Relations.”
Social Networks22:
45–64.
21.
MarkNoah1998.
“Birds of a Feather Sing Together.”
Social Forces77:
453–85.
22.
MayhewBruce H.LevingerRoger1976.
“Size and the Density of Interaction in Human Aggregates.”
American Journal of Sociology81:
1017–49.
23.
McAdamDoug1986.
“Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer.”
American Journal of Sociology92:
64–90.
24.
McPhersonJ. MillerSmith-LovinLynn1987.
“Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups.”
American Sociological Review52:
370–9.
25.
McPhersonJ. MillerPopielarzPamela A.DrobnicSonja1992.
“Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics.”
American Sociological Review57:
153–70.
26.
McPhersonJ. MillerSmith-LovinLynnCookJames M.2001.
“Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.
Annual Review of Sociology27:
415–44.
27.
MilgramStanley1967.
“The Small World Problem.”
Psychology Today
May:
60–7.
28.
MorrisMartinaKretzschmarMirjam1995.
“Concurrent Partnerships and Transmission Dynamics in Networks.”
Social Networks17:
299–318.
29.
RenzulliLinda A.AldrichHowardMoodyJames2000.
“Family Matters: Gender, Networks and Entrepreneurial Outcomes.”
Social Forces79:
523–46.
30.
ScottJohn1991.
Social Network Analysis: A Handbook.
New York:
Sage Publications.
