This article focuses on the house churches of the New Testament and their unique socio-physical structure. Since all the churches of the New Testament were communities small enough to meet in somebody's private home, certain theological and sociological ramifications arise out of this stark reality. From this data we can observe a “missionary model” which has relevancy for contemporary mission and church planting. Examples of effective church decentralization in the Two Thirds World further support this thesis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanksRobert1980Paul's Idea of Community: The Early House Churches in Their Historical Setting. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
2.
BarrettDavid B.1988“Living in the World of AD 2000.”World Evangelization15(55):11–14.
3.
BeaverR. Pierce1968American Protestant Women in World Mission: A History of the First Feminist Movement in North America. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
4.
BirkeyDel1984“Family Centered Christian Education.” Learning Unit No. 4, Bethany Theological Seminary, Oakbrook, IL.
5.
BirkeyDel1988The House Church: A Model for Renewing the Church. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.
6.
ChaoJonathan T.1989“God's Miraculous Signs Bring Millions to Christ in Mainland China!”Missions Tomorrow2(1):5–11.
7.
CookGuillermo1984“The Protestant Predicament: From Base Ecclesial Community to Established Church—A Brazilian Case Study.”International Bulletin of Missionary Research8(3):98–101.
8.
CostasOrlando E.1980“Conversion as a Complex Experience—A Personal Case Study,” In Down To Earth: Studies in Christianity and Culture. StottJohn R. W.CooteRobert eds. Pp. 173–191. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
9.
FilbeckDavid1985Social Context and Proclamation: A Socio-Cognitive Study in Proclaiming the Gospel Cross-Culturally. Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.
10.
FilsonFloyd V.1939“The Significance of the Early House Churches.”Journal of Biblical Literature58:105–112.
11.
HadawayKirkWrightStuart A.DuBoseFrancis M.1987Home Cell Groups and House Churches. Nashville, TN: Broadman.
12.
HiebertFrances1982“Missionary Women as Models in the Cross-Cultural Context.”Missiology10(4):455–460.
13.
HuntGarth1989“Vietnam—We Don't Need Our Church Buildings Anymore.”Windows On The World189:3.
14.
JudgeE. A.1960The Social Pattern of Christian Groups in the First Century. London: Tyndale.
15.
MacPhersonDave1971“Eutychus and His Kin.”Christianity Today15(7):30.
16.
MalherbeAbraham J.1977Social Aspects of Early Christianity. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
17.
McGavranDonald1970Understanding Church Growth. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
18.
MooreArt1989“Burmese Christians Find Isolation a Friend and Foe.”Pulse24(14):2.
19.
NelsonReed E.1989“Five Principles of Indigenous Church Organizations: Lessons from a Brazilian Pentecostal Church.”Missiology17(1):39–51.
20.
PadillaC. Rene1982“The Unity of the Church and the Homogeneous Unit Principle.”International Bulletin of Missionary Research6(1):23–30.
21.
PattersonVirginia1989“Women in Missions: Facing the 21st Century.”Evangelical Missions Quarterly25(1):62–71.
22.
RiddleDonald Wayne1938“Early Christian Hospitality: A Factor in the Gospel Transmission.”Journal of Biblical Literature57:141–154.
23.
SineTom1981The Mustard Seed Conspiracy. Waco, TX: Word.
24.
SnyderHoward A.1975The Problem of Wine Skins. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
25.
TidballDerek1984The Social Context of the New Testament: A Sociological Analysis. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, Academie Books.
26.
TuckerRuth ALiefeldWalter L.1987Daughters of the Church: Women and Ministry from New Testament Times to the Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, Academie Books.
27.
WebsterJohn C.B.WebsterEllen L., eds. 1985The Church and Women in the Third World. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster.
28.
The Willowbank Report 1980“Consultation on Gospel and Culture at Willowbank, Bermuda.” In Down To Earth: Studies in Christianity and Culture. StottJohn R. W.CooteRobert, eds. Pp. 308–342. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
