Women leaders are scarce in evangelical mission organizations. Part of the reason may be gender-role stereotypes, which function very strongly in much of evangelicalism. This article presents the stories of two women who worked at executive-level leadership positions in evangelical mission organizations. Using narrative analysis and a critical feminist lens, I examine their stories to understand how these women describe their leadership and how they portray their use of power. The strength of gender-role stereotypes and evangelical gender roles appeared to define and limit the power they were able to use. As long as they stayed within prescribed norms, they experienced some success. Deviations from the gender-role stereotypes led to sanctions from their organizations. Conclusions and implications are that the stereotypes may limit women’s leadership and that both women and organizations need to become aware of how these unspoken assumptions may be functioning. Recommendations for women leaders and for organizations seeking to incorporate women into leadership are offered.
AndersenMLHysockD (2009) Thinking about Women: Sociological Perspectives on Race and Gender. Boston, MA: Pearson.
2.
ArmstrongER (2007) How evangelical black women learn to negotiate power relations based on race and gender in their ministry preparation and practice. Thesis, Adult Education Department, Univeristy of Georgia.
3.
AuneK (2008) Evangelical Christianity and women’s changing lives. European Journal of Women’s Studies15: 277–94.
4.
BendrothML (1993) Fundamentalism & Gender, 1875 to the Present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
BieremaLL (2009) Critiquing human resource development’s dominant masculine rationality and evaluating its impact. Human Resource Development Review8: 68–96.
6.
BloomLR (2002) Stories of one’s own: Nonunitary subjectivity in narrative representation. In: MerriamSB (ed.) Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 289–309.
7.
BrennerOCTomkiewiczJScheinVE (1989) The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal32(3): 662–669.
8.
BrescollVL (2012) Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly20: 1–20.
9.
Butler-KisberL (2010) Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative, and Arts-informed Perspectives. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
CarliLLEaglyAH (2001) Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues57: 629.
11.
CarliLLEaglyAH (2011) Gender and leadership. In: BrymanA. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Leadership. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 103–17.
12.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
13.
DzubinskiLM (2011) Integrating women into leadership in mission agencies. Evangelical Missions Quarterly47: 356–59.
14.
EaglyAH (2007) Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly31: 1–12.
15.
EaglyAHJohannesen-SchmidtMC (2001) The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues57: 781–97.
16.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109: 573–98.
17.
FenshamC. (2013) Group discussion conclusions on the future of the discipline of missiology: Annual meeting of the American Society of Missiology. Missiology: An International Review42: 80–86.
18.
FrameMWShehanCL (2005) The relationship between work and well-being in clergywomen: Implications for career counseling. Journal of employment counseling42: 10–19.
19.
FreemanM. (2007) Standards of evidence in qualitative research: An incitement to discourse. Educational Researcher36: 25–32.
20.
GallagherSK (2004) The marginalization of evangelical feminism. Sociology of Religion65: 215–37.
21.
GallagherSKSmithC (1999) Symbolic traditionalism and pragmatic egalitarianism: Contemporary evangelicals, families, and gender. Gendery & Society13: 211–33.
22.
GaschoV (2008) The needs of women in organizational leadership. (accessed November 19, 2014).
23.
HeilmanMEKramKE (1983) Male and female assumptions about colleagues’ views of their competence. Psychology of Women Quarterly7: 329.
24.
HydeJS (2005) The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist60: 581–92.
25.
IngersollJ (1997) Engendered conflict: Feminism and traditionalism in late twentieth-century conservative protestantism. Thesis, University of California.
26.
IngersollJ (2003) Evangelical Christian Women: War Stories in the Gender Battles. New York: New York University Press.
27.
JohansonJ (2008) Perceptions of femininity in leadership: Modern trend or classic component?Sex Roles58: 784–89.
28.
Johnson-BaileyJ (2001) Sistahs in College: Making a Way out of No Way. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
29.
Johnson-BaileyJCerveroRM (1998) Power dynamics in teaching and learning practices: An examination of two adult education classrooms. International Journal of Lifelong Education17: 389–99.
30.
KoenigAM. (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin137: 616–42.
31.
McIntoshP (2007) White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. In: AndersenMLCollinsPH (eds) Race, Class, & Gender: An Anthology. 6th ed.Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
32.
Murphy-GeissG (2011) Married to the minister: The status of the clergy spouse as part of a two-person single career. Journal of Family Issues32: 932–55.
33.
PavalkoEKElderGH (1993) Women behind the men: Variations in wives’ support of husbands’ careers. Gender & Society7: 548–67.
34.
RossC (2006) Separate spheres or shared dominions?Transformation23: 228–35.
TisdellEJ (1993) Feminism and adult learning: Power, pedagogy, and praxis. In: MerriamSB (ed.) An Update on Adult Learning Theory. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 91–103.
40.
Van MaanenJ (2011) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
YoderJD (2001) Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues57: 815.
42.
ZellEKrizanZTeeterSR (2015) Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist70: 10–20.
