This article gives one example of a prefield process geared to the financial limitations, geographic distances, and conservative religious population represented by missionary candidates. Although some of these suggestions may seem at odds with the usual private practice, mono-cultural, geographically stable approach to psychology, this article suggests that, in evaluating missionary candidates, adjustments can be made for this unique, geographically disparate, and religious population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrittW. (1983). Pretraining variables in the prediction of missionary success overseas. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 203–212.
2.
DuckworthJ., & AndersonW. (1995). MMPI & MMPI-2. Interpretation manual for counselors and clinicians.Bristol, PA: Accelerated Development.
3.
FergusonL. N., KliewerD., LindquistB., & LindquistS. E. (1981). Essentials and tools of psychological assessment. In O'DonnellK., & O'DonnellM. L. (Eds.), Helping missionaries grow: Readings in mental health and missions (pp. 62–69). Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.
4.
FergusonL. N., KliewerD., LindquistS. E., WilliamD. E., & HenrichR. P. (1983). Candidate selection criteria: A survey. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 243–250.
5.
FoyleM. F. (1986). How to choose the right missionary. Evangelical Missions Quarterly, 22, 196–202.
6.
GardnerL. M. (1987). Proactive care of missionary personnel. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 15, 308–314.
7.
GlassA., RyanF., LubinA., RamanaC., & TickerA. (1956). Psychiatric prediction of military effectiveness. U.S. Armed Forces Medical Journal, 7, 1427–1443.
8.
HunterW. F. (1965). A survey of psychological evaluation programs in the selection of overseas missionary candidates. Unpublished master's thesis, Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, Mill Valley, CA.
9.
JensmaJ., PikeP., DuerksenC., & StraussG. (1997). The importance and the difficulty of doing research with a missionary population. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 384–387.
10.
KingL. J. (1975). The depressive syndrome: A follow-up study of 130 professionals working overseas. American Journal of Psychiatry, 132, 636–640.
11.
MenningerW., & EnglishJ. (1965). Psychiatric casualties from overseas Peace Corps volunteers. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 29, 148–158.
12.
MumperS. E. (1987, November 6). Does attrition threaten the future of missions?Christianity Today, 31, 53–55.
13.
PowellJ., & AndrewsL. (1993). Qualities desired in MK boarding school personnel. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 21, 86–92.
14.
SanfordD. (1994). Graveyard of missions requires new approaches. Evangelical Missions Quarterly, 30, 154–160.
15.
SchubertE. (1989). Emotional bruising in missionaries. Paper presented at Taiwan Missionary Fellowship Conference, Taiwan.
16.
SchubertE. (1992). Current issues in screening and selection. In O'DonnellK. (Ed.), Missionary care: Counting the cost for world evangelism (pp. 74–88). Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.
17.
SchubertE. (1993). Personality disorders and overseas missions: Guidelines for the mental health professional. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 21, 18–25.
18.
SchubertE. (1998). Prefield testing. Paper presented at Missionary Health Institute Conference, Toronto, Canada.
19.
SchubertE., & GantnerK. (1996). The MMPI as a predictive tool for missionary candidates. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 24, 124–136.
20.
Vander PolH. M. (1994). Missionary selection, stress, and functioning: A review of the literature. Unpublished doctoral paper, Biola University, La Mirada, CA.
21.
WilliamsK. (1973). Characteristics of the more successful and less successful missionaries. Dissertation Abstracts International34, 1786–1787B. (University Microfilms, No. 73–22, 697)
