This study examined the effectiveness of a religiously-based, object relations oriented psychotherapy treatment program. Effectiveness was measured by changes in personal adjustment and God image for a group of religious patients. An inpatient sample (N = 99), with the predominant diagnosis of major depression, was followed over the course of inpatient treatment and a year of outpatient treatment following hospitalization. Measures were administered at admission and discharge (N = 99), six months after discharge (n = 67), and 12 months after discharge (n = 30). The correlation of God image to object relations development was also examined. Inpatient treatment was found to have a significant positive impact on personal adjustment and God image. Improvement was maintained over the course of outpatient treatment but no significant further improvement was noted. Significant correlations were found among the measures at all four time points. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamsonR. (1978). Analysis of changes in interpersonal perceptions of self, God, and parents in hospitalized patients. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, Biola College, La Mirada, CA.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.
4.
Beit-HallahmiB., & ArgyleM. (1975). God as father projection: The theory and evidence. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 48, 71–75.
5.
BellM. (1991). An introduction to the Bell Object Relations Reality Testing Inventory. (Available from Morris D. Bell, PhD, Psychology Service, 116B, VA Medical Center, West Haven, CT 06516.
6.
BellM., BillingtonR., & BeckerB. (1985). Scale for the assessment of reality testing: Reliability, validity, and factorial invariance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 506–511.
7.
BellM., BillingtonR., & BeckerB. (1986). A scale for the assessment of object relations: Reliability, validity, and factorial invariance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 733–741.
8.
BensonP., & SpilkaB. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 297–310.
9.
BirkyI. T., & BallS. (1988). Parental trait influence on God as an object representation. Journal of Psychology, 122, 133–137.
10.
BrokawB. F., & EdwardsK. J. (1994). The relationship of God image to level of object relations development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22, 352–371.
11.
ChartierM., & GoehnerL. (1976). A study of the relationships of parent-adolescent communication, self-esteem, and God image. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 4, 227–232.
12.
CloudH. (1992). Changes that heal.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
13.
CloudH., & TownsendJ. (1987). The Cloud-Townsend model. Unpublished treatment manual.
14.
CloudH., & TownsendJ. (1994). 12 “Christian” beliefs that can drive you crazy.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
15.
CloudH., TownsendJ., OkamotoT., EdwardsK., & TisdaleT. C. (1994, August). An examination of object relations treatment for religiously committed patients. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
16.
CorzoD. M. (1981). Perceptions of God, parents, and self as a function of depression and Christian faith (Doctoral dissertation, Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 1164–1165B.
17.
DayN. D. (1980). Religious orientation, God concept, religious experience, social interest, and self-concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, Biola College, La Mirada, CA.
18.
DeanT. L. (1988). The relationship between father's parenting style, concept of God, and spiritual well-being in Christian college-aged women (Doctoral dissertation, Western Conservative Baptist Seminary, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 2374B.
19.
DucharmeE. L. (1989). Variations of God concept as a function of depression and incest (Doctoral dissertation, University of Detroit, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3434B.
20.
EdwardsK. (1976). Sex role behavior and religious experience. In DonaldsonW.Jr., (Ed.), Research in mental health and religious behavior.Atlanta: Psychological Studies Institute.
21.
EdwardsK. (1977). Religious experience as a function of self-concept and interpersonal behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, Biola College, La Mirada, CA.
22.
EdwardsK. (1978, April). Religious experience as a function of self-concept and interpersonal behavior. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Christian Association of Psychological Studies, Chicago, IL.
23.
EdwardsK., GoldbergG., HargroveJ., & LinamenC. (1979). Religious experience as a function of self-concept and interpersonal behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, Biola College, La Mirada, CA.
24.
EdwardsK. J., KempermanS. R., KeyT. L., & TisdaleT. C. (1994, August). Evaluating object relations inpatient treatment for religiously committed patients. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA.
25.
EdwardsK., & WesselS. (1980, September). Relationship of psychosocial maturity to intrapersonal, interpersonal, and spiritual functioning. Paper presented at the 88th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
26.
EllzeyC. H. (1961). Relationships among acceptance of self, acceptance of others, and belief in an accepting God (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts International, 22, 491.
27.
EnglemanE. A. (1985). Level of object representation in depression: A longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Adelphi University, New York.
28.
EysenckH. J. (1992). The effects of psychotherapy: An evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 659–663. (Original article published in 1952)
29.
FairbairnW. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality.London: Tavistock Publications.
30.
FayM. A. (1983). An object relations analysis at the conscious symbolic and memory content levels of the maternal and paternal components of the representation of God in five Christian women (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 4125–4126B.
31.
FellG. G. (1990). Self-perception: Improving self-concept in middle-age adults through understanding one's experience of developmental transitions (Doctoral dissertation, Biola University, Talbot School of Theology, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 3744B.
32.
FinnM., & GartnerJ. (Eds.). (1992). Object relations theory and religion: Clinical applications.Westport, CT: Praeger.
33.
FittsW. H. (1965). Manual for Tennessee (Department of Mental Health) Self Concept Scale.Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tests.
34.
FreudS. (1955). Totem and taboo. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 1–162). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1913)
35.
FreudS. (1959). Obsessive actions and religious practices. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115–127). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1907)
36.
FreudS. (1961). The future of an illusion. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 3–56). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1927)
37.
FreudS. (1964). Moses and monotheism. In StracheyJ. (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 1–137). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1939)
38.
GabbardG. O. (1992). The therapeutic relationship in psychiatric hospital treatment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 56, 4–19.
39.
GuntripH. (1949). Psychology for ministers and social workers.London: Independent Press.
40.
GuntripH. (1953). The therapeutic factor in psychotherapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 26, 115–132.
41.
GuntripH. (1956). Psychotherapy and religion.New York: Harper and Brothers.
42.
HardtH. (1963). Mental health status and religious attitudes of hospitalized veterans (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 1963). Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 5528.
43.
HattieJ. (1992). Self-concept.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
JacobsonN. S., & TruaxP. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12–19.
45.
JohnsonW. B., & EastburgM. C. (1992). God, parent, and self concepts in abused and nonabused children. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 235–243.
46.
JolleyJ. C., & TaulbeeS. J. (1986). Assessing perceptions of self and God: Comparison of prisoners and normals. Psychological Reports, 59, 1139–1146.
47.
JusticeW. G., & LambertW. (1986). A comparative study of the language people use to describe the personalities of God and their earthly parents. Journal of Pastoral Care, 40, 166–172.
48.
KingM. (1967). Measuring the religious variable: Nine proposed dimensions. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 173–190.
49.
KempermanS. R. (1994). The relationship between object relations maturity and depression, and the impact of object relations treatment on these two variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rosemead School of Psychology, Biola University, La Mirada, CA.
50.
KeyserM., & CollinsG. (1976). Parental images and the concept of God: An evangelical Protestant-Catholic comparison. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 4, 69–80.
51.
KrollJ., & SheehanW. (1989). Religious beliefs and practices among 52 psychiatric inpatients in Minnesota. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146(1), 67–72.
52.
LawrenceR. T. (1991). The God image inventory: The development, validation, and standardization of a psychometric instrument for research, pastoral, and clinical use in measuring the image of God.Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.
53.
LawrenceR. T. (1997). Measuring the image of God: The God image and the God Image Scales. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 25, 214–226.
54.
LipseyM. W., & WilsonD. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.
55.
LoweC., & BraatenR. (1966). Differences in religious attitudes in mental illness. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 434–445.
56.
LutherD. E. (1980). A comparative study of self-concepts and God-concepts among selected groups of graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 4462–4463B.
57.
MahlerM. S., PineF., & BergmanA. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant.New York: Basic Books.
58.
MorganR. (1979). Interpersonal perceptions of self, parents, and God among hospitalized psychiatric patients and nonpatients (Doctoral dissertation, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology, Biola College, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1962B.
59.
NelsonM. O. (1971). The concept of God and feelings toward parents. Journal of Individual Psychology, 27, 46–49.
60.
PrestonC. A., & VineyL. L. (1986). Construing God: An exploration of the relationships between reported interaction with God and concurrent emotional experience. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 319–329.
61.
RizzutoA. M. (1974). Object relations and the formation of the image of God. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47, 83–99.
62.
RizzutoA. M. (1979). The birth of the living God.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
63.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self.New York: Basic Books.
64.
RubinJ. H. (1990). A study examining changes in self-concept of psychiatric patients: Utilization of video feedback versus verbal feedback in groups (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University, New England Graduate School, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 3145B.
65.
Seligman (1995). The effectiveness of psychotherapy: The Consumer Reports study. American Psychologist, 50, 965–974.
66.
ShadishW. R., & SweeneyR. B. (1991). Mediators and moderators in meta-analysis: There's a reason we don't let dodo birds tell us which psychotherapies should have prizes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 883–893.
67.
ShafranskeE. P. (Ed.). (1996). Religion and the clinical practice of psychology.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
68.
SmithM. L., GlassG. V., & MillerT. I. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
SorensonR. L. (Ed.). (1994). Psychotherapy with religiously committed patients: A dialogue [Special issue]. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 22(4).
70.
SpearK. (1994). Conscious and preconscious God representations: An object relations perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA.
71.
StilesW. B., ShapiroD. A., & ElliottR. (1986). “Are all psychotherapies equivalent?”American Psychologist, 41, 165–180.
72.
TownsendJ. (1995). Hiding from love: How to change the withdrawal patterns that isolate and imprison you.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
73.
WareJ. R., & BarrJ. E. (1977). Effects of a nine-week structured and unstructured group experience on measures of self-concept and self-actualization. Small Group Behavior, 8, 93–100.
74.
WinnicottD. W. (1958). Collected papers: Through pediatrics to psycho-analysis.London: Tavistock Publications.
75.
WinnicottD. W. (1971). Playing and reality.London: Tavistock Publications.
76.
WoottonR. J. (1991). God-representation and its relation to object relations and defensive functioning (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 5600B.
