The integration of psychology and theology at the undergraduate level is faced with a variety of hurdles, but none is more daunting than the contextualization of the integrative question. By shifting the focus onto how individuals, both professors and students, function as integrators in particular developmental stages, a more likely process of responsible integration can be achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonR. S. (1990). Christians who counsel: The vocation of wholistic therapy.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
2.
AstinA. (1994). The American freshman: National norms for Fall 1994.Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
3.
BennerD. G. (1987). Christian counseling and psychotherapy.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
4.
BennerD. G. (1988). Psychotherapy and the spiritual quest.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
5.
CarterJ. D., & NarramoreB. (1979). The integration of psychology and theology: An introduction.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
6.
CollinsG. R. (1977). The rebuilding of psychology: An integration of psychology and Christianity.Wheaton, IL: Tyndale.
7.
CollinsG. R. (1981). Psychology and theology: Prospects for integration.Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
8.
CollinsG. R. (1994). The biblical basis of Christian counseling for people helpers.Colorado Springs, CO: Navepress.
9.
DykstraC., & ParksS. (1986). Faith development and Fowler.Birmingham, AL: Religious Education Press.
10.
ElkindD. (1979). The child and society.New York: Oxford.
11.
FarnsworthK. (1985). Wholehearted integration: Harmonizing psychology and Christianity through word and deed.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
12.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning.New York: Harper & Row.
