Several contemporary object relations theorists have amended Freud's treatment of religion as exclusively pathological. Broader object relational perspectives acknowledge the possibility of both a healthy and unhealthy line of religious development. Rather than every religious illusion necessarily dying of disenchantment as a person matures, one's religious beliefs may undergo continuous transformation and revision. Illusion is newly regarded as an essential and psychically useful component of human development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FairbairnW.R.D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality.London: Tavistock.
2.
FairbairnW.R.D. (1955). Observations in defense of the object-relations theory of personality. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 28, 144–156.
3.
FreudS. (1955). Totem and taboo. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 1–162). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1913)
4.
FreudS. (1959). Obsessive actions and religious practices. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, pp. 115–127). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1907)
5.
FreudS. (1961). Civilization and its discontents. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 56–145). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1930)
6.
FreudS. (1961). The future of an illusion. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 3–56). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1927)
7.
FreudS. (1964). Moses and monotheism. In StracheyJ. (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 1–137). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1939)
8.
GayP. (1987). A godless Jeu:New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
GrunbaumA. (1984). Foundations for psychoanalysis.Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
GuntripH. (1949). Psychology for ministers and social workers.London: George Allen & Unwin.
11.
GuntripH. (1953). The therapeutic factor in psychotherapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 26, 115–132.
12.
GuntripH. (1957). Psychotherapy and religion.New York: Harper & Brothers.
13.
GuntripH.1969). Religion in relation to personal integration. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 42, 323–333.
14.
McDarghJ. (1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion: On faith and the imaging of God.New York: University Press of America.
15.
MacMurrayJ. (1961). Persons in relation.New York: Harper & Brothers.
16.
MeissnerW.W. (1984). Psychoanalysis and religious experience.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17.
MengH., & FreudK.L. (Eds.). (1963). Psychoanalysis and faith: The letters of Sigmund Freud and Oskar Pfister.New York: Basic.
18.
PfisterO. (1928). Die illusion einer Zukunft [The illusion of the future]. Imago, 14, 149–184.
19.
PhilpH.L. (1956). Freud and religious belief.London: Rockliff.
20.
PolanyiM. (1958). Personal knowledge.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
PruyserP. (1974). Between belief and unbelief.New York: Harper & Row.
22.
RieffP. (1966). The triumph of the therapeutic.New York: Harper & Row.
23.
RizzutoA. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
RushdoonyR.J. (1965). Freud.Phillipsburg, NY: Presbyterian and Reformed.
25.
SaffadyW. (1976). New developments in the psychoanalytic study of religion; A bibliographic review of the literature since 1960. Psychoanalytic Review63, 292–300.
26.
VitzP. (1988). Sigmund Freud's Christian unconscious.New York: Guilford.
27.
WinnicottD.W. (1971). Playing and reality.London: Tavistock.
