From a perspective which integrates object relations psychology and Scripture the concept of the transitional object is applied to the therapeutic relationship with the psychotherapist or pastoral counselor serving as a transitional object to God, who is conceived of as the Perfect Object. By becoming a good enough object or an effective ambassador for Christ who mediates God's love for the client, the therapist can utilize the client's temporary dependence upon the therapist to enable them to make the transition from dependence upon visible but imperfect parental figures to reliance upon the invisible God who is perfectly loving. It is suggested that in order for clients to make the transition to a healthy dependence upon God they need to relinquish the moral defense which idealizes unloving parents, grieve the loss in having had less than perfect parents, integrate their good and bad part object representations, and utilize an internalized object representation of the good enough therapist as a foundation for developing a good image of God. Suggestions are offered for how the Christian therapist can adopt the therapeutic role of being a transitional object to God.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Augustine. (1980). Basic writings of Saint Augustine (Vol. 1; OatesW., Ed. and Trans.). Grand Rapids: Baker. (Original work published 400)
2.
BennerD. (1983). The incarnation as a metaphor for psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 287–294.
3.
BennerD. (1989). Toward a psychology of spirituality: Implications for personality and psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 8(A).19–30.
4.
BensonP., & SpilkaB. (1973). God image as a function of self-esteem and locus of control. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 297–309.
5.
BionW. (1970). Attention and interpretation.London: Tavistock Publications.
6.
BishopL.C. (1985). The dream of the magician: A case of parataxic distortion. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(2), 12–14.
7.
BuberM. (1958). I and thou (R. Smith, Trans.), New York: Scribners.
8.
CharrierM., & GoehnerL. (1976). A study of the relationships of parent-adolescent communication, self-esteem, and God image. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 4, 227–232.
9.
de CarvalhoB.R.S. (1986). The role of psychotherapy in the process of reconciliation. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 5(3), 28–31.
10.
DeconchyJ.P. (1965). The idea of God: Its emergence between 7 and 16 years. In GodinA. (Ed.), From religious experience to a religious attitude (pp. 97–108). Chicago: Loyola University Press.
11.
EdkinsW. (1985). Psychoanalysis and religious experience. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(2), 86–90.
12.
FairbairnW.R.D. (1986). The repression and the return of bad objects. In BuckleyP. (Ed.), Essential papers on object relations (pp. 102–126). New York: New York University Press. (Original work published 1943)
13.
FairbairnW.R.D. (1954). An object-relations theory of the personality.New York: Basic.
14.
FreudS. (1951). Leonardo Da Vinci and a memory of his childhood. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Trend (Vol. XI, pp. 59–227). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1910)
15.
GaultiereW.J. (1989a). A biblical perspective on therapeutic treatment of client anger at God. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 8(3), 38–46.
16.
GaultiereW.J. (1989b). The development and preliminary validation of a measure of Cod images. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University, San Diego, CA.
17.
GaultiereW.J., & GaultiereK.S. (1989). Mistaken identity: Clear up your image of God and enjoy his love.Old Tappan, NJ: Revell.
GuinessO. (1976). In two minds.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity.
20.
HarmsE. (1944). The development of religious experience in children, American Journal of Sociology, 50, 112–122.
21.
HeinrichsO.J. (1982). Our father which an in heaven: Parataxic distortions in the image of God. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 10, 120–129.
22.
JusticeW.G., & LambertW. (1986). A comparative study of the language people use to describe the personalities of God and their earthly parents. The Journal of Pastoral Care, 40, 166–172.
23.
KernbergO. (1966). Structural derivatives of object relationships. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 47, 236–253.
24.
LubinA. (1959). A boys’ view of Jesus. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 14, 155–168.
25.
MahlerM.S. (1967). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15, 710–763.
26.
MahlerM.S. (1972). On the first three subphases of the scparation-individuation process. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 53, 333–338.
27.
McDarghJ. (1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion.New York: University Press of America.
28.
McDarghJ. (1986). God, mother and me: An object relational perspective on religious material. Pastoral Psychology, 34, 251–263.
29.
OdenT.C. (1966). Kerygma and counseling.Philadelphia: Westminster.
30.
RizzutoA.M. (1974). Object relations and the formation of the image of God. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47, 83–99.
31.
RizzutoA.M. (1979). The birth of the living Cod.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
RutledgeA.L. (1951). Concepts of God among the emotionally upset. Pastoral Psychology, 2, 22–27.
33.
SeamandsD.A. (1985). The healing of memories.Wheaton: Victor.
34.
WackD. (1908). The image of God in psychotherapy: A study of cases. In GodinA. (Ed.), From cry to word (pp. 95–106). Brussels: Lumen Vitae.
35.
WhiteF.J. (1985). Earthly father / heavenly Father. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(2), 76–82.
36.
WhiteS.A. (1984). Imago dei and object relations theory: Implications for a model of human development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 12, 286–293.
37.
WinnicottD.W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psycho-Analysh, 34, 89–97.
38.
WinnicottD.W. (1965). The development of the capacity for concern. The maturational processes and the facilitating environment.New York: International Universities Press.
39.
WinnicottD.W. (1969). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50, 711–717.
