The relevance of theologies for religious experience is illustrated in three content areas in the empirical psychology of religion: (a) projection theories of religious experience; (b) images-of-God research; and (c) identity theories of mystical experience. In each area arguments are made to indicate the relevance of theologies for empirical research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1950). The individual and his religion.New York: Macmillan.
2.
BowkerJ. (1973). The sense of God.New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
BuberM. (1965). Between man and man.New York: Macmillan.
4.
CoplestonF. (1982). Religion and the one.New York: Crossroads.
5.
DittesJ. E. (1969). Psychology and religion. In LindseyG., & ArosonE. (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 5, pp. 602–656). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
EarleW. (1980). Mystical reason.Chicago: Gateway.
7.
FreudS. (1957). The future of an illusion.New York: Anchor.
8.
GodinA. (1986). The psychological dynamics of religious experience.Birmingham: Religious Education.
9.
GrunbaumA. (1987). Psychoanalysis and theism. The Monist, 70, 152–192.
10.
HarperR. (1966). Human love existential and mystical.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
11.
HodgesD. L. (1974). Breaking a scientific taboo: Putting assumptions about the supernatural into scientific theories of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 13, 393–408.
12.
HoodR. W.Jr. (1985a). The conceptualization of religious purity in Allport's typology. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 413–417.
13.
HoodR. W.Jr. (1985b). Mysticism. In HammondP. (Ed.), The sacred in a secular age (pp. 285–297). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
HoodR. W.Jr. (in press). Mysticism, the unity thesis and the paranormal. In ZollschanG. K., SchumakerJ. F., & WalshG. F. (Eds.), Exploring the paranormal.
15.
HoodR. W.Jr., & HallJ. R. (1980). Gender differences in the description of erotic and mystical experiences. Review of Religious Research, 21, 195–207.
16.
HuxleyA. (1954). The doors of perception.New York: Harper.
17.
JamesW. (1961). Varieties of religious experience.New York: Mentor. (Original work published 1902)
18.
JohnstonW. (1970). The still point.New York: Harper and Row.
19.
KatzS. T. (Ed.). (1978). Mysticism and philosophical analysis.New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
KungH. (1979). Freud and the problem of God.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
MalonyH. N. (1977). The psychologist Christian. In MalonyH. N. (Ed.), Current perspectives in the psychology of religion (pp. 392–413). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
22.
MalonyH. N. (1985). An S-O-R model of religious experience. In BrownL. B. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of religion (pp. 113–126). New York: Pergamon.
23.
RobertsB. (1984). The experience of no-self.Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
24.
RobinsonD. N. (1981). An intellectual history of psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
25.
SpilkaB., HoodR. W.Jr., & GorsuchR. (1985). The psychology of religion.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26.
StaceW. T. (1961). Mysticism and philosophy.New York: Macmillan.
27.
TracyD. (1987). The analogical imagination.New York: Crossroad.
28.
VaihingerH. (1968). The philosophy of “as if.”New York: Barnes & Noble.
29.
VergoteA., & TamayoA. (Eds.). (1981). The parental figures and the representation of God.The Hague: Mouton.
30.
WuthnowR. (1985). Science and the sacred. In HammondP. (Ed.), The sacred in a secular age (pp. 187–203). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
ZaehnerR. C. (1961). Mysticism sacred and profane.New York: Oxford University Press.
