Psychologists examining the effects of religiosity on other beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors have at times suffered from a lack of sophistication concerning the very real impact of differences in theology among various groups in the United States. Specific examples of this lack of sophistication are discussed. Recent findings concerning fundamentalism are then considered as examples of a more sophisticated approach. Lastly, a number of methodological and conceptual recommendations are offered to help bring theological perspectives to bear on research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottW. M. (Ed.). The documents of Vatican II.New York: Guild.
2.
Baptist-Catholic Western Regional Conference. (1976). Conversion to Christ and life-long growth in the Spirit.Atlanta: Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention.
3.
BatsonC. D., & VentisW. L. (1982). The religious experience: A social-psychological perspective.New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
BatsonC. D., & VentisW. L. (1985). Misconception of quest: A reply to Hood and Morris. Review of Religious Research, 26, 398–407.
5.
BrinkerhoffM. B., & MacKieM. M. (1984). Religious denominations’ impact upon gender attitudes: Some methodological implications. Review of Religious Research, 25, 365–378.
6.
BrownL. B. (Ed.). (1985). International series in experimental social psychology: Vol. 11. Advances in the psychology of religion.New York: Pergamon.
7.
ByrnesJ. F. (1984). The psychology of religion.New York: Free Press.
8.
CampbellC., & ColesR. W. (1973). Religiosity, religious affiliation, and religious belief: The exploration of a typology. Review of Religious Research, 14, 151–158.
9.
ClineV. B., & RichardsJ. M. (1965). A factor-analytic study of religious belief and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 569–578.
10.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1897)
11.
FinnerS. L. (1970). Religious membership and religious preference: Equal indicators of religiosity?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 9, 173–179.
12.
GorsuchR. L. (1970). Rokeach's approach to value systems and social compassion. Review of Religious Research, 11, 139–147.
13.
GorsuchR. L. (1984). Measurement: The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.
14.
GreeleyA. M. (1963). A note on the origins of religious differences. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 3, 21–31.
15.
HarrisonM. I., & LazerwitzB. (1982). Do denominations matter?American Journal of Sociology, 88, 356–377.
16.
HertelB. R., & HughesM. (1987). Religious affiliation, attendance, and support for “pro-family” issues in the United States. Social Forces, 65, 858–882.
17.
HoodR. W.Jr. (1983). Social psychology and religious fundamentalism. In ChildsA. W., & MeltonG. (Eds.). Rural psychology (pp. 169–198). New York: Plenum.
18.
HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisR. J. (1985a). Boundary maintenance, socio-political views, and presidential preference among high and low fundamentalists. Review of Religious Research, 27, 134–145.
19.
HoodR. W.Jr., & MorrisR. J. (1985b). Conceptualization of quest: A critical rejoinder to Batson. Review of Religious Research, 26, 391–397.
20.
HoodR. W.Jr., MorrisR. J., & WatsonP. J. (1986). Maintenance of religious fundamentalism. Psychological Reports, 59, 547–559.
21.
Hornsby-SmithM. P., ProcterM., RajanL., & BrownJ. (1987). A typology of progressive Catholics: A study of the delegates to the National Pastoral Congress. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 243–248.
22.
HunterJ. D. (1983). American evangelicalism: Conservative religion and the quandary of modernity.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23.
JohnsonP. (1976). A history of Christianity.New York: Atheneum.
24.
KelleyD. M. (1972). Why conservative churches are growing.New York: Harper and Row.
25.
LazerwitzB., & HarrisonM. (1980). A comparison of denominational identification and membership. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19, 361–367.
26.
MacDonaldC. B., & LuckettJ. B. (1983). Religious affiliation and psychiatric diagnoses. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 15–37.
27.
McClainE. W. (1979). Religious orientation the key to psychodynamic differences between feminists and nonfeminists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 40–45.
28.
MeadowM. J., & KahoeR. D. (1984). Psychology of religion: Religion in individual lives.New York: Harper and Row.
29.
NudelmanA. E. (1971). Dimensions of religiosity: A factor-analytic view of Protestants, Catholics, and Christian Scientists. Review of Religious Research, 13, 42–56.
30.
PaloutzianR. F. (1983). Invitation to the psychology of religion.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co.
31.
PopeW. (1976). Durkheim's Suicide: A classic analyzed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
QuinnB., AndersonH., BradleyM., GoettingP., & ShriverP. (1982). Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980: An enumeration by region, state, and county based on data reported by 111 church bodies.Atlanta: Glenmary Research Center.
33.
RokeachM. (1969a). Value systems in religion. Review of Religious Research, 11, 3–22.
34.
RokeachM. (1970). Commentary on the commentaries. Review of Religious Research, 11, 155–162.
35.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values.New York: Free Press.
36.
SloaneD. M., & PotvinR. H. (1983). Age differences in adolescent religiousness. Review of Religious Research, 25, 142–154.
37.
SpilkaB., & BridgesR. A. (1989). Theology and psychological theory: Psychological implications of some modern theologies. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 14, 342–349.
38.
SpilkaB., HoodR. W.Jr., & GorsuchR. L. (1985). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39.
SpilkaB., & SchmidtG. (1983). General attribution theory for the psychology of religion: The influence of event-character on attributions to God. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 326–339.
40.
StackS., & KanavyM. J. (1983). The effect of religion on forcible rape: A structural analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 67–74.
41.
StarkR., & BainbridgeW. S. (1985). The future of religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation.Berkeley: University of California Press.
42.
StarkR., DoyleD. P., & RushingJ. L. (1983). Beyond Durkheim: Religion and suicide. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 120–131.
43.
StarkR., & BlockC. Y. (1968). American piety: The nature of religious commitment.Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
VernonG. M. (1968). The religious “nones.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 7, 219–229.
45.
WarnerR. S. (1979). Theoretical barriers to the understanding of evangelical Christianity. Sociological Analysis, 40, 1–9.
