The systematic value (i.e., religious) assumptions of many areas of psychology are being increasingly explored. This article focuses on the organizational values reflected by actions of the American Psychological Association (APA). For illustrative purposes, humanism and evangelical Christianity are described and related to several APA activities and publications. APA is found to favor humanistic values and is encouraged to adopt several specific organizational changes. APA can become a stronger organization by encouraging professional self-evaluation and pluralism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelesN. (1983). Minutes of the annual meeting of the council of representatives. American Psychologist, 38, 649–682.
2.
AlbeeG.W. (1982). Preventing psychopathology and promoting human potential. American Psychologist, 37, 1043–1050.
3.
AlbeeG.W. (1984). Reply to Lantz (letter). American Psychologist, 39, 82–84.
4.
AlbrechtS.L., & HeatonT.B. (1984). Secularization, higher education, and religiosity. Review of Religious Research, 26, 43–58.
5.
American Psychological Association. (1963). Ethical standards of psychologists. American Psychologist, 18, 56–60.
6.
American Psychological Association. (1983). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association.Washington, DC: Author.
7.
Beit-HallahmiB. (1977). Curiosity, doubt, and devotion: The beliefs of psychologists and the psychology of religion. In MalonyH.N. (Ed), Current perspectives in the psychology of religion.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
8.
BerginA.E. (1980). Psychotherapy and religious values. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 95–105.
9.
BirdW.R. (1978). Freedom of religion and science instruction in public schools. The Yale Law Journal, 36, 515–570.
10.
BoiceJ.M. (1978). The foundation of biblical authority.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
11.
BraunthalA. (1979). Salvation and the perfect society.Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
12.
BroughtonJ.M. (1981). The genetic psychology of James Mark Baldwin. American Psychologist, 36, 396–407.
13.
BryerK.B. (1979). The Amish way of death: A study of family support systems. American Psychologist, 34, 255–261.
14.
CaplanA.L., & JenningsB. (1984). Darwin, Marx, and Freud: Their influence on moral theory.New York: Plenum.
15.
CauthenK. (1962). The impact of American religious liberalism (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
16.
CeciS.J., PetersD., & PlotkinJ. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40, 994–1002.
17.
CunninghamS. (1985, May). Humanists celebrate gains, goals. APA Monitor, p. 16, 18.
18.
deSilvaP. (1984). Buddhism and behavior modification. Behavior Research and Therapy, 22, 661–678.
19.
DunphyJ.J. (1983). A religion for a new age. The Humanist, 43(1), 23–26.
20.
FrameR. (1983). A professor is fired for his creationist views, he believes. Christianity Today, 27(18), 35.
21.
GartnerJ.D. (1982, August). Christians need not apply: Religious discrimination in clinical psychology graduate admissions. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
22.
GartnerJ. (1985). Religious prejudices in psychology: Theories of its cause & cure. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 4(1), 16–23.
23.
GeislerN.L. (1983). Is man the measure? An evaluation of contemporary humanism.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
24.
GoodmanL.E., & GoodmanJ.J. (1983). Creation and evolution: Another round in an ancient struggle. Zygon, 18, 3–43.
25.
GorsuchR.L. (1984). Measurement The boon and bane of investigating religion. American Psychologist, 39, 228–236.
26.
GoveP.B. (1971). Webster's third new international dictionary.Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam Co.
27.
HaanN. (1982). Can research on morality be “scientific?”American Psychologist, 37, 1096–1104.
28.
HeidelA. (1951). The Babylonia Genesis (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
29.
HindsonE. (1979). Biblical view of man: The basis for confrontation. Journal of Pastoral Practice, 3, 33–58.
30.
HoyleF. (1983). The intelligent universe.London: Michael Joseph.
31.
KurtzP. (1973). The humanist alternative: Some definitions of humanism.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
32.
KurtzP. (1983). In defense of secular humanism.Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
33.
KurtzP., & WilsonE.H. (1973). Humanist manifesto II. The Humanist, 33(19), 4–9.
34.
LantzG.E. (1984). Psychology's bias: A response to Albee (letter). American Psychologist, 39, 80–82.
35.
LarueG.A. (1984). The way of ethical humanism: A religion to meet the psychological needs of our time. The Humanist, 44(5), 20–25, 42.
36.
LearyD.E. (1980). The intentions and heritage of Descartes and Locke: Toward a recognition of the moral-basis of modern psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 102, 283–310.
37.
LewinR. (1980). Evolutionary theory under fire. Science, 210, 883–887.
38.
LewisK.N. (1984). Pretherapy value information: A safeguard for clients’ rights. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 3, 19–26.
39.
LewisK.N., DavisC.S., & LesmeisterR. (1983). Pretherapy information: An investigation of client responses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 108–112.
40.
LoweC.M. (1969). Value orientations in counseling and psychotherapy.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41.
MachenJ.C. (1923). Christianity and liberalism.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
42.
McDowellJ., & StewartD. (1983). Handbook of today's religions.San Bernardino, CA: Here's Life Publishers.
43.
McQuilkenR.J. (1977). The behavioral sciences under the authority of Scripture. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 20, 32–43.
44.
MesserS.B. (1985). Choice of method is value laden too. American Psychologist, 40, 1414–1415.
45.
MilesS. J. (1985). The roots of the scientific revolution: Reformed theology. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 27, 158–168.
46.
MillerP. (1983). The New England mind: From colony to province.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
MillerW.R. (1983). Chance, choice, and the future of reproduction. American Psychologist, 38, 1198–1205.
48.
MorrisH. (1974). Scientific creationism.LaVerne, CA: El Camino Press.
49.
MullerR., & Vande KempH. (1985). On psychologists’ uses of Calvinism (letter). American Psychologist, 40, 466–468.
50.
NeumannJ.K. (1982). Creationism in Christian psychology. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 1, 51–54.
51.
PackerJ.I. (1958). Fundamentalism and the Word of God.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
52.
PerloffR. (1986, February). Dues: What they buy. APA Monitor, p. 2.
53.
PettyJ.D. (1984). Christian psychological apologetic. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 3, 8–17.
54.
RaloffJ. (1983). Math education—Does it have the right stuff?Science News, 123, 346–348.
55.
RandolphW. (1979). God is pro life. The Journal of Pastoral Practice, 3(3), 9–27.
56.
RenwickA.M. (1960). The story of the Scottish reformation.Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
57.
RobinsonD.N. (1984). Ethics and advocacy. American Psychologist, 39, 787–793.
58.
RollinB.E. (1985). The moral status of research animals in psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 920–926.
59.
RubleR. (1985). How introductory psychology text books treat religion. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 37, 180–182.
60.
SchaefferF.A. (1968). The God who is there.Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
61.
SchaefferF.A. (1981). A Christian manifesto.Westchester, IL: Crossway Books.
62.
SchweigerdtB. (1982). The gnostic influence on psychology: Effects of the common heresy. Journal of Psychology and Theology.10, 221–229.
63.
SegalR.A. (1985). Have the social sciences been converted?Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 321–324.
64.
ShostakA.B., & McLouthG. (1984). Men and abortion: Lessons, losses and love.New York: Praeger.
65.
Some information for parents and families of lesbians and gays. (1984). A social issue release by the APA Board of Social and Ethical Responsibility for Psychology.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
TaxS., & CallenderC. (Eds.). (1960). Evolution after Darwin (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
ThaxtonC.B., BradleyW.L., & OlsenR.L. (1984). The mystery of life's origin: Re-assessing current theories.New York: Philosophical Library Publishers.
69.
TurkingtonC. (1985, November). Abortion case brief supports counseling, rights of minors. APA Monitor, p. 22.
70.
Van TilC. (1971). Psychology of religion.Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed.
71.
Van TilC. (1972). The Calvinistic concept of culture.Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
72.
VitzP.C. (1981). From a secular to a Christian psychology. In WilliamsonP., & PerrottaK. (Eds.). Christianity confronts modernity (pp. 121–149). Ann Arbor, MI: Servant Books.
73.
VitzP.C. (1982). Studies in formative spirituality. Journal of Ongoing Formation, 3, 263–282.
74.
VitzP.C. (1984). A covenant theory of personality: A theoretical introduction. In MorrisL. (Ed.) The Christian vision: Man in society.Hillsdale, MI: The Hillsdale College Press.
75.
WellbornS.N. (1982). Ahead: A nation of illiterates. U.S. News & World Report, 92(19), 53–57.
76.
When children are unwanted (1983). A social issue release by the APA Board of Social & Ethical Responsibility for Psychology.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
77.
WoodbridgeJ.D. (1982). Biblical authority: A critique of the Rogers/McKim proposal.Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
78.
WoodwardW.R. (1982). The “discovery” of social behaviorism and social learning theory, 1870–1980. American Psychologist37, 296–410.
79.
WoolfolkR.L., & RichardsonF.C. (1984). Behavior therapy and the ideology of modernity. American Psychologist, 39, 777–786.
80.
WorthingtonE.L.Jr. (1984). The impact of psychology's philosophy of continual change on evangelical Christianity. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 36, 3–8.
81.
YockeyH.P. (1977). A calculation of the probability of spontaneous biogenesis by information theory. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 67, 377–398.
