Kohut's contributions toward the understanding of narcissistic development are briefly reviewed, then cast into a mode of theological inquiry that delineates his anthropology and soteriology, utilizing the initial sketch of these dimensions drawn by Randall (1980). Kohut's view of “Tragic Man” searching to fulfill the blueprint of the essential self in actualizing ideals and ambitions through healthy forms of narcissism, of humanity's fall from the realization of these ideals and the means of restoration, are integrated with the biblical account of the dilemma at the Fall, the consequent impact upon the human condition, and God's solution to this predicament.
BrunnerE. (1939). Man in revolt (O. Wyon, Trans.). Philadelphia: Westminster.
3.
CalvinJ. (1972). Institutes of the Christian religion. (H. Beveridge, Trans.). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans (Original work published 1559)
4.
EricksonM. (1968). The new evangelical theology.Westwood, NJ: Revell.
5.
KohutH. (1971). The analysis of the self.New York: International Universities Press.
6.
KohutH. (1977). The restoration of the self.New York: International Universities Press.
7.
MahlerM.S., PineF., & BergmanA. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant.New York: Basic Books.
8.
MorrisonA.P. (1984). Working with shame in psychoanalytic treatment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 32, 479–505.
9.
NarramoreS.B. (1984). No condemnation.Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
10.
RandallR.L. (1980). Soteriological dimensions in the work of Heinz Kohut. Journal of Religion and Health, 19, 83–91.
11.
RandallR.L. (1984). The legacy of Kohut for religion and psychology. Journal of Religion and Health, 23, 106–114.
12.
VanderploegR.D. (1981a). Imago Dei, creation as election: Foundations for psychotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 9, 209–215.
13.
VanderploegR.D. (1981b). Imago Dei as foundational to psychotherapy: Integration versus segregation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 9, 299–304.
14.
WhiteS.A. (1984). Imago Dei and object relations theory: Implications for a model of human development. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 12, 286–293.
