There has been both theory and research to suggest that conservative religiosity is associated with a sense of life purpose. Much of this research has utilized the Purpose-in-Life (PIL) test. There has been some debate, however, regarding the homogeneity of this measure. The present study found that the PIL test consists of two factors, one reflecting life purpose and another reflecting life satisfaction. Conservative religiosity was associated with high scores on the PIL (as a whole), as well as on both purpose and life satisfaction items. Implications for both future use of the PIL and for past research on life purpose are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CrandallJ.E., & RasmussenR.D. (1975). Purpose in life as related to specific values. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 483–485.
2.
CrowneD.P., & MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
3.
CrumbaughJ.C. (1968). Crossvalidation of the Purpose-in-Life test based on Frankl's concepts. Journal of Individual Psychology, 24, 74–81.
4.
CrumbaughJ.D., & MaholickL.T. (1964). An experimental study in existentialism: The psychometric approach to Frankl's concept of noogenic neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 200–207.
5.
CrumbaughJ.C., RaphaelSr. M., & ShraderR.R. (1970). Frankl's will to meaning in religious order. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 206–207.
DuftonB.D., & PerlmanD. (in press). Loneliness and religiosity: In the world but not of it. Journal of Psychology and Theology.
8.
EllisonC.W., & CampiseR. (1978). Developmental background, loneliness, and spiritual well-being. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco.
9.
EllisonC.W., & EconomosT. (1981). Religious orientation and quality of life. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Christian Association for Psychological Studies, San Diego.
10.
EllisonC.W., & PaloutzianR.F. (1979). Religious experience and quality of life. In PaloutzianR.F. (Chair), Spiritual well-being, loneliness, and quality of life. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
11.
FranklV. (1963). Man's search for meaning.New York: Washington Square Press.
12.
GlockC.V. (1962). On the study of religious commitment. Religious Education, 6, 57–65.
13.
HuntR.A. (1972). Mythological-symbolic religious commitment: The LAM scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 42–52.
14.
KelleyD.M. (1972). Why conservative churches are growing.New York: Harper and Row.
15.
PaloutzianR.F. (1981). Purpose in life and value changes following conversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1153–1160.
16.
PaloutzianR.F., & EllisonC.W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and the quality of life. In PeplauL.A., & PerlmanD. (Eds.) Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 224–237). New York: Wiley-Interscience.
17.
RekerG.T., & CousinsJ.B. (1979). Factor structure, construct validity and reliability of the Seeking of Noetic Goals (SONG) and Purpose in Life (PIL) tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 85–91.
18.
SchweikerW.F. (1969). Religion as a superordinate meaning system and socio-psychological integration. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 8, 300–307.
19.
WuthnowR. (1976). The consciousness reformation.Berkeley: University of California Press.
