Piaget and Parables: The Convergence of Secular and Scriptural Views of Learning

Abstract

Jean Piaget is widely acclaimed as a developmental theorist who has contributed much to the understanding of how children learn. While many educators adhere to Piaget's model of learning, few realize that techniques similar in structure were used by Jesus 2000 years ago. Basic components of Piaget's theory, namely assimilation, accommodation, and disequilibration of the learner, are evidenced in the parabolic method used by Jesus. This comparison between Piaget's theory and Christ's parabolic method suggests that an effective teacher would cognitively activate and disequilibrate the learner. Insights from Scripture and Piaget's theory imply that motivation through disequilibration should be effective with students having a variety of experiences, a wide spectrum of abilities, and a mixture of learning styles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barclay

(1970). And Jesus said: A handbook on the parables. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

Biehler

R. F.

(1978). Psychology applied to teaching. (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Cole

(1978). How education affects the mind. Human Nature, 1(4), 50–58.

Farnsworth

K. E.

(1982). The conduct of integration. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 10, 308–336.

Finkel

D. L.

, & Monk

G. S.

(1979). The design of intellectual experience. The Journal of Experiential Education, 2(2) 31–38.

Flavell

J.H.

(1963). The developmental psychology of Jean Piaget. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

Grauf-Grounds

(1982). Language as change agent: Metaphor in the work of Jay Haley and in the parables of Jesus. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 10, 212–220.

Greenfield

P. J.

, & Bruner

(1966). Culture and cognitive growth. International Journal of Psychology, 1, 89–107.

Keating

M. C.

, & Clark

L. V.

(1980). Development of physical and social reasoning in adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 16, 23–30.

10.

Kogan

(1971). Educational implications of cognitive styles. In Lesser

G. S.

(Ed.) Psychology and Educational Practice (pp. 242–292). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

11.

Kohlberg

, & Gilligan

(1971). The adolescent as a philosopher: The discovery of self in a postconventional world. Daedalus, 100, 1051–1086.

12.

Morgan

(1943). The parables and metaphors of our Lord. Westwood, NJ: Fleming H. Revell.

13.

Neimark

E. D.

(1975). Intellectual development during adolescence. In Horowitz

F. D.

(Ed.) Review of Child Development Research (Vol. 4, pp. 541–594). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

14.

Piaget

(1968). Six psychological studies. New York: Random House.

15.

Piaget

(1970). Piaget's theory. In Mussen

P. H.

(Ed.) Carmichael's manual of child psychology (pp. 703–732). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

16.

Shepperson

V. L.

(1981). Paradox, parables and change: One approach to Christian hypnotherapy. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 9, 3–11.

17.

Sontag

L. W.

, & Newberry

(1940). Normal variations of fetal heart rate during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40, 449–452.

18.

Spelt

D. K.

(1948). The conditioning of the human fetus in utera. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 338–346.

19.

Stein

R. H.

(1981). Introduction to the parables of Jesus. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

20.

Thorson

W. R.

(1981). The biblical insights of Michael Polanyi. Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation, 33, 129–138.