Recent attempts to measure the quality of life or subjective well-being show promise for a more helpful and accurate appraisal of the collective and individual state of people than objective, economically-oriented indicators have allowed. Unfortunately, the quality of life movement has virtually ignored the religious dimension of life and the part that such beliefs and practices play in well-being. In response to this void, Paloutzian and Ellison (1982) have developed a Spiritual Well-Being Scale which measures both religious and existential well-being. This article reports on the conceptualization of the spiritual well-being dimension, development of the scale, research which has utilized the scale, and suggests directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W., & RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
2.
AllportG., VernonP. E., & LindzeyG. A. (1960). A study of values (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
BlaikieN. W. H., & KelsenG. P. (1979). Locating self and giving meaning to existence: A typology of paths to spiritual well-being based on new religious movements in Australia. In MobergD. O. (Ed.) Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
4.
BradburnN. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being.Chicago: Aldine.
5.
CampbellA., ConverseP. E., & RodgersW. L. (1976). The quality of American life.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
CampbellA. (1981). The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends.New York: McGraw-Hill.
7.
CrumbaughJ. C., & MaholickL. T. (1969). The purpose of life test.Munster, IN: Psychometric Affiliates.
8.
EllisonC. W. (1983). Saying goodbye to loneliness and finding intimacy.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
9.
EllisonC. W., & ColeK. (1982). Religious commitment, television viewing, values, and quality of life. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 1, 21–32.
10.
FabryJ. B. (1980). The pursuit of meaning.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
11.
FowlerJ. W. (1981). Stages of faith.San Francisco: Harper & Row.
12.
FranklV. (1963). Man's search for meaning.New York: Washington Square.
LynchJ. J. (1977). The broken heart: The medical consequences of loneliness.New York: Basic Books.
15.
McNamaraP. H., & St. GeorgeA. (1979). Measures of religiosity and the quality of life: A critical analysis. In MobergD. O. (Ed.) Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
16.
MobergD. O. (1979). Spiritual well-being: Background and issues.Washington, DC: White House Conference on Aging.
17.
MobergD. O. (1974). Spiritual well-being in late life. In GubriumJ. F. (Ed.) Late life: Communities and environment policy.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
18.
MobergD. O. (1979a). The development of social indicators of spiritual well-being for quality of life research: Papers and problems. Sociological Analysis, 40, 11–26.
19.
MobergD. O. (1979b). Spiritual well-being.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
20.
MobergD. O., & BrusekP. M. (1978). Spiritual well-being: A neglected subject in quality of life research. Social Indicators Research5, 303–323.
21.
National Interfaith Coalition on Aging. (1975). Spiritual well-being: A definition.Athens, GA: NICA.
22.
PaloutzianR. F., & EllisonC. W. (1982). Loneliness, spiritual well-being and quality of life. In PeplauL. A., & PerlmanD. (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy.New York: Wiley Interscience.
23.
RobinsonJ. P., & ShaverP. R. (1969). Measures of social psychological attitudes.Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
24.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values.New York: Free Press.
25.
RussellD., PeplauL. A., & FergusonL. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294.
