Abstract
Perceived theological imperatives, which are paradoxical in nature, can result in a classic double-bind situation which place a Christian believer in a position where no “correct” or “obedient” response is possible. Such double-binds entrap Christians in a way that they can neither take action, not take action, nor comment upon the dilemma of the entrapment itself. A prolonged exposure to such double-binds can result in a neurotic symptomatology that is directly induced by the double-bind situation. The author develops a theoretical framework for understanding “induced Christian neurosis” through an examination of experimental neuroses, paradoxes, pragmatic paradoxes, and double-binds. Final consideration is given to the resolution of the double-bind predicament.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.