Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The relationship of group size, leader consideration behavior, and leader initiating structure behavior with member satisfaction was assessed. Respondents included 57 members of 14 small Christian growth groups made up primarily of evangelical undergraduate university students. Members' responses indicated that leader consideration and initiating structure were independent dimensions rather than two extremes of one dimension. Leaders were reported to exhibit somewhat less initiating structure behavior than members thought was desirable. Correlations and regression analyses showed that the absolute value of the discrepancy between actual and ideal leader initiating structure was more highly related to satisfaction than was actual initiating structure alone. Leader consideration was proportionately related to member satisfaction while group size was inversely related to satisfaction. When leading groups or training leaders of groups similar to those studied, the best amount of leader initiating structure should be determined partly on the basis of member expectations, expectations which may change during the life of a group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

J. P.

, & Dunnette

M. D.

Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 73–104.

Evans

M. G.

The effects of supervisory behavior on the path-goal relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance., 1970, 5, 277–298.

Fagan

, & Shepherd

Gestalt therapy now. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science and Behavior Books, 1970.

Fleishman

E. A.

The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953, 37, 1–6.

Fleishman

E. A.

Twenty years of consideration and structure. In Fleishman

E. A.

, & Hunt

J. G.

(Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1973.

Hannan

M. T.

Problems of aggregation. In Blalock

H. M.

Jr. (Ed.), Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago: Albine Publishing Co., 1971.

Hays

W. L.

Statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1973.

House

R. J.

A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971, 16, 321–338.

House

R. J.

, & Dessler

The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In Hunt

J. G.

, & Larson

L. L.

(Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1974.

10.

House

R. J.

, & Mitchell

T. R.

Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1974, 3, 81–97.

11.

Kerr

, & Schriesheim

C. A.

Consideration, initiating structure, and organizational criteria — An update of Korman's 1966 review. Personnel Psychology, 1974, 27, 555–568.

12.

Kerr

, Schriesheim

C. A.

, Murphy

C. J.

, & Stogdill

R. M.

Toward a contingency theory of leadership based upon the consideration and initiating structure literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 62–82.

13.

Korman

A. K.

“Consideration,” “Initiating Structure,” and organizational criteria. Personnel Psychology, 1966, 18, 349–360.

14.

Nunnally

J. C.

Psychometric theory (2nd Ed.). N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

15.

Stogdill

R. M.

Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. N.Y.: The Free Press, 1974.

16.

Stogdill

R. M.

, & Coons

A. E.

Leader behavior: Its description and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research, 1957.

17.

Weissenberg

, & Kavanagh

M. J.

The independence of Initiating Structure and Consideration: A review of the literature. Personnel Psychology, 1972, 25, 119–130.

Leader Behavior,Group Size,and Member Satisfaction in University Christian Growth Groups

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References