A small study is reported of responses to paralinguistic cues in religious broadcasting. Respondents indicated their assessment of speakers’ age, sex, and style of presentation together with evaluations of 14 excerpts. Questions are raised about the effectiveness with which the goals of such broadcasting are reached.
ArgyleM., AlkemaF., & GilmourR.The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals.European Journal of Social Psychology, 1972, 1, 385–402.
3.
BugentalD. E., KaswanJ. W., & LoveL. R.Perception of contradictory meanings conveyed by verbal and non-verbal channels.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 16, 647–655.
4.
ButlerP.Evangelism and the media: A theological basis for action. In DouglasJ. D. (Ed.), Let the earth hear his voice.Minneapolis: World Wide Publications, 1975.
5.
DavitzJ. R.The communication of emotional meaning.New York: McGraw Hill, 1964.
6.
HarrisonR. P.Beyond words: An introduction to non-verbal communication.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
7.
HindeR. (Ed.). Non-verbal communication.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
YuT.Coordination of Christian media forces: Winning the global battle of evangelization. In DouglasJ. D. (Ed.), Let the earth hear his voice.Minneapolis: World Wide Publications, 1975.
