The premise that we can arrive at a deeper analysis of faith by examining it in the light of what we know of the concept of attitudes in psychology is presented. Attitudes are shown to have three components: (a) the cognitive; (b) the affective; and (c) the active. Three levels of attitudes are also presented as: (a) acceptance level; (b) preference level; and (c) commitment level. Several passages of Scripture are presented as evidence that biblical faith also has these same three components and levels. It is concluded that moving from the well researched field of attitudes to a less understood concept such as faith can aid in our understanding of faith.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerA.Practice and theory of individual psychology.New York: Harcourt, 1927.
2.
AllportG. W.Attitudes. In MurchisonC. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology.Worchester, Mass.: Clark University Press, 1935.
3.
AllportG. W.The nature of personality: Selected papers.Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1950. Analytical Greek lexicon. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
4.
AndersonL., & FishbeinM.Prediction of attitudes from evaluative aspects of beliefs about the attitude object.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 437–443.
5.
BloomB. S. (Ed.), Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York: David McKay, 1956.
6.
BogardusE. S.Measuring social distances.Journal of Applied Sociology, 1925, 9, 299–308.
7.
CattellR. B.Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study.New York: McGraw, 1950.
8.
DunelmV.Faith. In The international standard Bible encyclopedia.Grand Rapids: Eerdmahs, 1939.
9.
FestingerL.A theory of cognitive dissonance.Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1957.
10.
FishbeinM. (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement.New York: Wiley, 1967.
11.
GuttmanL.The third component of scalable attitudes.International Journal of Opinion and Attitude Research, 1950, 4, 285–287.
12.
HeiderF.Attitudes and cognitive organization.Journal of Psychology, 1946, 21, 107–112.
13.
KrathwohlD. R., BloomB. S., & MasiaB. B.Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain.New York: David McKay, 1964. 1964.
14.
LewisV.Prediction of academic performance from adolescent attitude-press organizations.Journal of Educational Research, 1970, 63, 204–208.
15.
LikertR.Technique for the measurement of attitudes.Archives of Psychology, 1932, 22, 55.
16.
MaddiS. R.Personality theories: A comparative analysis.Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1972.
17.
MaslowA. H.A theory of metamotivation: The biological rooting of the value-life.Humanities, 1969, 4, 301–343.
18.
OsgoodC. E., SuciG. J., & TarmenbaumP. H.The measurement of meaning.Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
19.
RogersC. R.Actualizing tendency in relation to “motives” and to consciousness. In JonesM.R. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium in motivation.Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1963.
20.
RosenbergM. J.Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 53, 367–372.
21.
ShawM., & WrightE.Scales for the measurement of attitudes.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
22.
ThomasW. I., & ZnanieckiF.The Polish peasant in Europe and America: Vol. I.Boston: Badger Press, 1918.
23.
ThurstoneL. L.Theory of attitude measurement.Psychological Review, 1929, 36, 222–241.
24.
TriandisH., & FishbeinM.Cognitive interaction in person perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 446–453.
