Comparative MMPI-2 Norms between Free and United Methodist,Catholic Priest,Episcopal,and Presbyterian Ministry Candidates

Abstract

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) is often utilized to assess the suitability of ordination candidates by a religious organization. Published MMPI-2 scale scores for Roman Catholic priest, Episcopal, Presbyterians, and United Methodist ministry samples exist. However, previous research has not provided MMPI-2 scale scores for Free Methodist ordination candidates and has not provided a statistical comparison of scale scores between religious groups. The this study reports on MMPI-2 scale scores for Free Methodist ordination candidates and compares this group’s scores to Roman Catholic priests, Episcopal and Presbyterian ordination candidates, and a United Methodist sample. We found statistically significant differences between Free Methodist and Catholic Priests, Episcopal, Presbyterian ordination candidates on MMPI-2 Hs, Pd, Pt, and Sc scales and L, Pd, Mf, Pa, Pt, Sc, and Ma differences between Free and United Methodist groups. These results seem to indicate that Free Methodist candidates have fewer non-organic health concerns, less obsessive thoughts, positive social relationships, and more readily submit to authority when contracted with other comparative ordination candidates or ministry sample.

Keywords

Free Methodist ordination candidates MMPI-2 norms Roman Catholic Episcopal Presbyterian United Methodist

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

H. M.

(2003). What’s “free” about “Free Methodist”? Seattle Pacific University Response, 26(3). https://spu.edu/depts/uc/response/Summer2k3/freemethodist.html

Bonney

L. A.

Park

H. S.

(2012). Appraisal of applicants for ministry careers. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15, 721–739. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2011.623229

Brenneis

M. J.

(2001). Personality characteristics of clergy and of psychologically “impaired” clergy: A review of the literature. American Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 4, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/J062v04n02_03

Butcher

J. N.

(2001). The Minnesota report: Revised personnel system user’s guide. University of Minnesota Press.

Butcher

J. N.

Dahlstrom

W. G.

Graham

J. R.

Tellegen

Kraemmer

(1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press.

Butcher

J. N.

Graham

J. R.

Ben-Porath

Y. S.

Tellegen

Dahlstrom

W. G.

(2001). Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation: MMPI-2 (Revised ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Cardwell

S. W.

(1996). Seminary norms for the MMPI-2. The Journal of Pastoral Care, 50, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234099605000106

Free Methodist Church USA. (2021). The Free Methodist way. Free Methodist Church. https://www.fmcusa.org/the-free-methodist-way

Graham

J. R.

(2011). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psychopathology (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

10.

Iron

Laaser

(1994). The abduction of fidelity: Sexual exploitation by clergy-experience with inpatient assessment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 1, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720169408400034

11.

Marlett

Wetherbee

Donofrio

(2012). Normative MMPI-2 profiles of Christian counseling students: An investigation of subculture in standardized testing. Pastoral Psychology, 61, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0373-4

12.

Patrick

(1991). Personality characteristics of male and female pastoral candidates. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 19, 186–196.

13.

Peterson

J. L.

(2000). Personality, demographic, and situational variables distinguishing ministers who stay with or leave the ministry [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ohio State University.

14.

Piersma

H. L.

(1987). The use of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory in the evaluation of seminary students. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 15, 227–233.

15.

Plante

T. G.

Aldridge

Louie

(2005). Are successful applicants to the priesthood psychologically healthy? Pastoral Psychology, 54, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-005-6185-7

16.

Plante

T. G.

Apodaca

(2011). Episcopal applicants to ordained ministry: Are they psychologically healthy? Pastoral Psychology, 60, 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-010-0315-6

17.

Plante

T. G.

Lackey

(2007). Are successful applicants to the Roman Catholic deaconate psychologically healthy? Pastoral Psychology, 55, 789–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-007-0081-2

18.

Rosik

C. H.

Renteria

Pittman

(2012). Psychological profiles of individuals seeking ordination in the Episcopal or Presbyterian (PCUSA) churches: Comparison and contrasts. Pastoral Psychology, 61, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-011-0390-3

19.

Sullender

R. S.

(1993). Clergy candidates’ MMPI profiles: Comparing gender and age variables. Journal of Pastoral Care, 47, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234099304700309

20.

Thomas

S. N.

Plante

T. G.

(2015). Psychological well-being of Roman Catholic and Episcopal clergy applicants. Pastoral Psychology, 64, 875–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-015-0655-3

21.

Viswesvaran

Deller

Ones

(2007). Personality measures in personnel selection: Some new contributions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00394.x